Determining Order and Rate Constant for Ozone Reaction at 298 K

  • Thread starter Thread starter plexus0208
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The reaction between ozone and an organic species at 298 K is determined to be first order based on the linear relationship observed in the ln[O3] vs. time graph. To calculate the rate constant (k), the equation ln[A]t = ln[A]o - kt can be used, where [A]t represents the ozone concentration at any point on the graph. It is crucial to select a point from the plotted line for accuracy in determining k. The discussion emphasizes the importance of graphical analysis in confirming reaction order and calculating rate constants. Understanding the relationship between concentration and time is key to solving this reaction kinetics problem.
plexus0208
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a reaction between ozone and an organic species, the observed rate was found to depend only on the concentration of ozone at 298 K. Using the data below, determine the order of this reaction and the rate constant (include units).
Time (s) |Ozone conc (molecules/cm3)
0 | 4.311×1015
50 | 2.890×1015
100 | 2.036×1015
150 | 1.435×1015
200 | 0.995×1015
250 | 0.689×1015

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Is it first order? I plotted the graph of ln[O3] vs. time on excel and that was a straight line.
Also to find k, do I use ln[A]t = ln[A]o - kt? If I use this equation, which value do I use for [A]t?--because the value of k differs slightly for different values.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When contemplating whether the reaction is first order or not, I would advise taking a graphical approach. Try to imagine what a graph would look like if the line had an equation of a first order reaction versus a second order reaction. Perhaps you may even want to try looking at the graphic behaviour of higher order reactions although the first two may suffice.

Now, when you are determining the value of [A]t, you have to understand that any point on the line works. "HOWEVER," you must use a point on the graph that you have created. Don't forget that when you are creating a line of best fit, you are assuming only the points on that line are relevant, not the points away from the line that helped form it.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top