Determining order of the poles in z/(e^z-1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratpigeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles
Ratpigeon
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the order of the poles of

f(z)=z/(e^z-1)


Homework Equations



The poles are at z=2 π i k k\inZ\0
(Because at z=0 f(z) has a removable singularity -set f(0)=1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the Taylor series of e^z - \sumz^n/n!
But I just got
f(z)=1/\sumz^n/(n+1)!
and I somehow need to take out a factor of (z-2 π i k)^j for some j>0 out of that...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ratpigeon said:

Homework Statement


Find the order of the poles of

f(z)=z/(e^z-1)


Homework Equations



The poles are at z=2 π i k k\inZ\0
(Because at z=0 f(z) has a removable singularity -set f(0)=1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the Taylor series of e^z - \sumz^n/n!
But I just got
f(z)=1/\sumz^n/(n+1)!
and I somehow need to take out a factor of (z-2 π i k)^j for some j>0 out of that...

Given f(z), what is the minumum power of (z-z_0) would I have to multiply the function by so that:

\lim_{z\to z_0} (z-z_0)^n f(z) \neq \infty

Take for example at zero:

\lim_{z\to 0} z^0 \left(\frac{z}{e^z-1}\right)\neq \infty

thus the order of the pole at zero is zero, i.e., it's removable. Ok, now you try the pole at 2n\pi i.
 
Right - got them. I got my brain stuck on taylor series, when I needed L'hopitals rule. Thanks.
They're simple poles with limits z->z_0=z_0, right? :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top