Determining the composition of a coordination compound using molar conductivity

AI Thread Summary
Molar conductivity can provide insights into the composition of coordination compounds by analyzing the types and charges of ions in solution. The substance CoBr3 dot 4 NH3 dot 2 H2O has a molar conductivity of 42 kS/m at infinite dilution, indicating the presence of specific ions. Understanding how molar conductivity relates to the number of ions and their charges is crucial for determining the coordination sphere's composition. While there may not be direct resources available, estimating the ions based on conductivity can lead to conclusions about the complex's structure. This approach emphasizes the importance of ion characteristics in analyzing coordination compounds.
cncbmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The substance CoBr3 dot 4 NH3 dot 2 H2O ha a molar conductivity of 42 kS/m at infinite dilution. Indicate the composition of the coordination sphere.

Homework Equations



I don't know any relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution



Where can we read about how molar conductivity can tell us the composition of a coordination sphere? I googled this and have not found a tutorial on how to do this type of question.

I don't recall molar conductivity being mentioned in my high school chemistry class when we did coordination spheres.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no direct link, however, think how the molar conductivity depends on the ions present in the solution - types, numbers, charges... Once you can estimate what ions are present, you can conclude how the complex looks.

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top