Determining the mass of globular cluster?

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the mass of a globular cluster with a radius of 20 parsecs and a root mean square velocity of 3 km/s, the virial theorem is recommended over thermodynamic approaches. The relevant mass formula derived is M=2v^2R/G, which simplifies the calculation. The discussion highlights the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, noting that kinetic energy is expressed as 1/2Mv^2. To understand the potential energy derivation, it is explained that it can be represented as -1/4 GM^2/R, linking gravitational interactions to the cluster's mass. This approach allows for a clearer understanding of the dynamics within the globular cluster.
trina1990
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
: Estimate the mass of a globular cluster with the radius of R=20pc and root
mean square velocity of stars equal to Vrms=3km/s

i can apply the formula like
Vrms=(root over) 3RT/M ( where R=gas constant, T= absolute temperature, M=mass of the cluster)

but here the variable of the "T" is missing...
how can i derive the answer?

another formula applies like
V rms= (root over) 3p/k (here, p=pressure of the gasses within the cluster, k=density of the cluster)

here, Pressure is missing..

should i guess these amounts or there are some hidden clues here to solve it out?

please help
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Use the virial theorem instead of trying to use thermodynamics. It doesn't really make sense to talk about the temperature of a globular cluster.
 
nicksauce said:
Use the virial theorem instead of trying to use thermodynamics.
Sure, but...

nicksauce said:
It doesn't really make sense to talk about the temperature of a globular cluster.

Longair talks about modelling the velocity distribution of galaxies in a galaxy cluster (or stars in a globular cluster) as an "isothermal gas sphere" http://books.google.ca/books?id=e-w...tion by Longair&pg=PA103#v=onepage&q&f=false"

In this situation, it looks like the "temperature" is defined by setting (3/2)kT = (1/2)\mu \langle v^2 \rangle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you ...
i didn't even heard of this theory earlier as i am not a physics student...
any way i got the equation for the mass to be

M=2v^2R/G
now i can easily solve this out...

but can you please help me a bit more to completely understand the equation..?
as it says
the kinetic energy=-1/2 potential energy
then i derived kinetic energy to be 1/2Mv^2...
but how do they derive the potential energy to be
1/4 GM^2/R
please make me it understand with simple mechanics..no calculus please..
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top