Determining the Optimal Thickness for a 30mH-Solenoid Inductor

AI Thread Summary
To create a 30mH solenoid inductor using enameled copper wire wrapped around a 7-inch rebar, calculations indicate that 613 turns are necessary based on the assumed permeability of the rebar. The thickness of the copper wire is not critical for inductance but affects the resistance of the solenoid. The initial assumption of the rebar's permeability was 100, but it was later corrected to 2000, which may impact the number of turns needed. It's recommended to verify the actual permeability of the rebar material for accurate calculations. Understanding these factors is essential for designing an effective solenoid inductor.
chemic_23
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hi, i just have few questions on how to make a 30mH-inductor (solenoid). I have an enameled copper wire which i will wrapped into a 7-inch rebar having 12mm diameter. In order to determine the number of turns, i made some calculations:

Homework Equations


L=(uAN^2)/d

The Attempt at a Solution



My computations are as follows:
L=30e^-3 H
u=100*4*pi*10^-7 (permeability of the rebar=100 (just an assumption))
A=pi*(6e^-3) m^2 (r=12mm/2=6mm=6e^-3 m)
d=0.1778 m

N=613 turns

my question is:
-how will i know what is the thickness of the copper wire I'm going to use?
-and, is my permeability assumption correct? (i don't really know what is the exact permeability of the rebar)

some photos of rebar:
http://www.circlecityrebar.com/istock_rebar6.jpg"
http://rebar.materialsuppliers.com/Rebar-big.jpg"

please help thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
thickness of wire doesn't matter, except the fact that it determines the resistance of the solenoid. check the permeability of the material the rebar is made of, on net, just search in google.
 
so, in order to have 30mH, i need to make 613 turns? :eek:
 
if permeability is actually 100, and ur calculations are correct (i have not checked them), then your answer is 613 turns.
 
i've found out that its permeability is 2000.. thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top