Determining the velocity of sound in the air by the resonance method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the velocity of sound in air using a tuning fork and a closed-end pipe. Two methods are proposed: the End Correction method, which applies a correction factor to the first resonant length based on tube diameter, and the Second Resonant Length method, which calculates the distance between two resonant lengths to determine wavelength. Key questions raised include identifying sources of measurement uncertainty, suitable tuning fork frequencies, predicting third resonance lengths, and the rationale behind not applying the end correction in the second method. The results from two different tube diameters show varying effective lengths and calculated velocities. The conversation emphasizes the need for participants to demonstrate effort in their inquiries to receive assistance.
mjdom
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



measure the velocity of sound in the air using tuning fork and a pipe closed at one end

method a: End Correction involves applying a correction factor to the first resonant length based on the diameter of the tube used.

method b: Second Resonant Length involves finding two successive resonant lengths of the air column within the pipe. The distance between these points represents half a wavelength of the resonance frequency.

equipment - two lengths of PVC tubing of 30mm and 50mm diameter

Homework Equations



Le= L + 0.29d
wavelength of the sound = 2x (L2-L1)

The Attempt at a Solution



questions i want to ask,,

- list the main source of measurement uncertainty
- what frequencies of tuning forks is more suitable
- predict third resonance length for each tuning fork used in method b
- what value you would expect in substracting the second resonant length from thr third resonant length?
- expain why the end correction factor is not applied in the second part of the investigation
- reason for measuring air temperature inside the pipe[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diameter of tubes 50mm - first resonant length L (m) : 0.304 / effective length Le (m) : 0.318 / wavelength 4 x Le (m): 1.274 / velocity : 326.14

diameter of tubes 30mm - first resonant length L (m) : 0.33 / effective length Le (m) : 0.338 / wavelength 4 x Le (m): 1.354 / velocity : 346.14

fork 1 frequency : 256

i havnt got result for method 2...
 
Questions are not attempts at solutions. What are your thoughts on each of your questions? You need to show some effort before help can be given.
 
gneill said:
Questions are not attempts at solutions. What are your thoughts on each of your questions? You need to show some effort before help can be given.
i know but to be honest i have no idea about this experiment.. can u give some examples? so i can get some idea
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top