Determining work done by rapidly expanding gas

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a gas during a rapid expansion due to an explosion, where the volume increases from V to 3V at constant atmospheric pressure (P0). Participants clarify that traditional equations like dw = -pdV are not applicable due to the irreversible nature of the explosion. Instead, the work done is determined by integrating the external pressure against the change in volume, specifically using the integral ∫P0 dV from the initial to final volume, which can be simplified to the limits V to 3V.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law (PV = nRT)
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic principles, particularly work and internal energy (dU = dQ + dW)
  • Knowledge of irreversible processes in thermodynamics
  • Ability to perform integrals involving pressure and volume changes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of irreversible processes in thermodynamics
  • Learn how to calculate work done during gas expansions using integrals
  • Explore the concept of momentum flux and its relation to pressure in expanding gases
  • Review the principles of heat transfer in fast processes and its impact on thermodynamic calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics, as well as engineers working with gas dynamics and energy systems.

pphhyyssiiccss
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A gas initially occupying a volume V undergoes a sudden explosion, causing its volume to triple to 3V. Assuming that the pressure of the environment (atmospheric pressure po) remains constant, find an expression for the work done by the gas.
Hint: Please notice that an explosion is a rapid and irreversible process. Because this process happens far from equilibrium, the pressure of the gas (p) is not well defined and the expression dw = - pdV cannot be applied to the gas undergoing the explosion.


Homework Equations



pv=nRT
dU = TdS-pdV
dU = dQ+ dW


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not really sure how to even begin. I was trying to relate this to the Joule free expansion, but I don't think that is correct. I think entropy will come into account.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm tempted to say not really enough information. The statement "a sudden explosion" doesn't really explain whether there's additional energy added via the explosion. But the volume of gas is expanding into a background at constant pressure. Thus the volume change works against the background gas at atmospheric pressure, pushing it back. The pressure inside the gas volume is then irrelevant, only the gas pressure it's working against. Try that.
 
I think "a sudden explosion" just means the gas expands rapidly and we will ignore any energy needed to create the explosion. So, I should find the work that the volume change does on the constant background pressure?

I'm unsure of how to do this.
 
A sudden explosion only stands for "fast process" - in my opinion. Since the heat transfer is usually a fairly slow process this only gives you a hint that your system will not exchange any heat with the environment (surrounding gas).

And yes, entropy will come into account. Firstly I suggest you find out what changes and what doesn't. So the questions you should answer: dp=?, dV=? and dT=?

After that, how does one calculate the entropy of ideal gas?

EDIT: Oh, and everything I just wrote may be completely wrong. :) It's been a while since I had Thermodynamics.
 
Fast process means dQ = 0. There is no time for heat to move in or out of the system.
 
See my Physics Forums Blog in my PF personal area. Qraal was correct in post #2.

chet
 
Entropy is a red herring because it's not reversible, and dQ does not equal TdS, but as has been said, it does equal 0. So you have dU = dW, so you could answer the question if you knew dU. Unfortunately, you don't, so there no better way than to just calculate the work on the surrounding gas. The surrounding gas does have a well-defined momentum flux (i.e., pressure) at the surface of the expanding gas, because the particles bouncing off the expanding wall don't know it's coming until it gets there. That means the problem is just like you had a momentum flux of tennis balls coming at you, and you smack them all with one swing of a moving racket. It doesn't matter how fast you swing the racket, it only matters the distance the racket moves, because if you swing it faster you do proportionally more work but over proportionally less time. So you just integrate PdV, where P is the external pressure so is constant. That's a trivial integral, yes?
 
yeah Ken's right. But now the P in the integral is not the pressure of the gas, but the pressure it is pushing against: ##\int P_0 dV##
 
Ken G, I think I understand what you're saying. So we know dQ = 0 because it is a fast process and does not have time to exchange heat (as said by skrat)? And the only thing we can actually calculate is the work done on the surroundings gas? Which is the integral of the constant surrounding pressure, but with what limits of integration? V to 3V? V to 3V is the change of volume of the internal gas rather than the outside gas. Why would we use these limits?

Sorry, I'm having so much trouble understanding this. (haha)
 
  • #10
Imagine the outside gas has volume Vo originally. What is it's volume ultimately? It is Vo - 2V, because it has lost volume 2V in the expansion. So actually, the "real" limits of integration are Vo to Vo - 2V, but if you work out that integral, it would be the same as using V to 3V with the opposite sign (work done on, rather than work done by, the usual care you must take to get the sign of work right-- I usually just impose the sign logically). The key point is that for doing PdV integrals, it is not the initial and final V that matters, it is the change in V that matters.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K