Determining X-ray strength and exposure

  • Thread starter Thread starter GrimCrimson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strength X-ray
AI Thread Summary
Measuring the strength of X-rays and their potential danger in an industrial setting is critical, especially when considering the removal of an aluminum enclosure around a machine used for measuring crystal orientation. The current gauge on the machine indicates a range of 0 to 2 keV, but there is uncertainty about the enclosure's effectiveness. Suggestions include using x-ray film for testing, but concerns arise regarding legal liabilities if safety is compromised. It is essential to consult with a Radiation Protection Officer and ensure compliance with OSHA regulations before making any modifications to the equipment. Proper assessment and adherence to safety protocols are necessary to protect operators and avoid potential legal repercussions.
GrimCrimson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I work in an industrial facility and I am trying to come up with a way to measure the strength of X-rays and the danger they pose to the operators of a piece of equipment we have. As of now there is an aluminum enclosure around the part of the machine where the X-rays are emitted, but we are looking at removing it. The machine is used to measure crystal orientation.

We are 99.99% sure that the enclosure is not actually doing anything but I need to come up with a way to conclusively prove this before we can remove it.

The gauge on the front of the machine goes from 0 to 2 keV.

I have done a fairly extensive search on the internet but cannot find anything that I can really understand that will help me.

Does anyone know of a method I can use to determine that this machine will be safe without the enclosure?


Thank you in advance.

If any information is missing or I need to clarify something please let me know.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I am CERTAINLY NOT an expert on this topic, but have you considered x-ray film? You might have a chat with your local Veterinarian, he will likely have x-ray training, film and some suggestions.

Fish
 
Suppose someone were to develop cancer and to sue you. I don't think a defense like "the radiation level is low...you see, we got some film from a vet" is going to do anything except get you laughed out of the courtroom. Right after you lost everything you had.

You have some license to operate this machine, or the manufacturer has a license to sell it to people without a license, if the exposure is low enough. It is virtually certain that the license says that it is valid only insofar as no modifications are made to the machine.

You need to be talking to your Radiation Protection Officer and/or whoever handles OSHA compliance at your workplace.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top