Diagonalising an n*n matrix analytically

  • Thread starter Thread starter A Dhingra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
A Dhingra
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone
I am trying to diagonalise a (2n+1)x(2n+1) matrix which has diagonal terms A_ll = (-n+l)^2 and other non vanishing terms are A_l(l+1) = A_(l+1)l = constant.
Is there any way I can solve it for general n without having to use any numerical methods.
I remember once a professor diagonalised such a matrix for a fixed value of n using some tricks, but I can't remember how he did that. Can anyone help me out here?

Any help is appreciated. Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gauß algorithm should need about 4n steps (+- a few), and you can do it analytically and see if the result has some reasonable expression (but even if it does not, you get an analytic result).
 
Hi ...
I have managed to find an iterative expression to solve for the eigenvalues. But without selecting a fixed value of n I can't do anything with it. Any suggestions how I can go ahead with it.
Thanks mfb
 
Finding the eigenvalues for a matrix is equivalent to solving the n degree eigenvalue equation. There is NO algebraic method for exactly solving a general polynomial of degree 5 or higher.
 
Are you assuming that ##A_{j,j+1}= A_{j+1,j} = a ## for all ##j##? (i.e.> that ##a## is the same for all ##j##). If so, then the case when ##a=1## and all other entries are ##0## is the case of the so-called free Jacobi matrix. Its spectrum is computed in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. Your case then can be obtained by a simple affine transformation.

Even if your ##a##s are different, look up Jacobi matrices and orthogonal polynomials.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top