Diagonalization of Specif Matrix

ApproxIdent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Now this could seem like a homework problem...but it's not. (I guess you'd need to believe me or just choose not to answer my question.) I'm trying to compute the eigenvalues of a matrix and it's a little more irritating than I'd expected. All I really care is if they're positive (so all I really need is for the top determinant to be positive). The matrix is

\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & v_1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & \cdots & v_2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & \cdots & v_3 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ v_1 & v_2 & v_3 & \cdots & v_n \end{bmatrix}

I feel like there must be some basic way of doing this that I'm missing. I'm reading a paper that works with (basically) the same matrix. The author writes down specific conditions (hich I presume is correct) so I could just accept it on face, but I'm a little frustrated at my inability to do this myself.

Anyway, if you're the type to love solving these problems you could spare me a bit of a headache...thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind...it was easy. Apparently the process of deleting rows and columns is too complex for me. In case you're curious, it's:

v_n - \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} v_i^2
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top