Did I do anything wrong in this limit evaluation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pylauzier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit evaluation of lim x→0 xln(2x) can be effectively solved using L'Hôpital's Rule. The substitution u = 1/x transforms the limit into lim u→∞ ln(2/u) / u, which is suitable for applying L'Hôpital's Rule. The correct application leads to the conclusion that the limit evaluates to 0. An alternative method involves rewriting the limit as ln(2x)/(1/x), which also confirms the result without the need for substitution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L'Hôpital's Rule
  • Familiarity with limits and indeterminate forms
  • Basic knowledge of logarithmic functions
  • Experience with variable substitution in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in various limit problems
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in calculus
  • Practice evaluating limits involving indeterminate forms
  • Learn about alternative methods for solving limits without substitution
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and L'Hôpital's Rule, as well as self-learners seeking to validate their understanding of limit evaluations.

pylauzier
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A problem in my book asks the reader to evaluate lim x→0 xln(2x) using L'Hôpital.

Homework Equations



None


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I got it right but I simply wanted to make sure I did no illegal manipulations (I'm self-studying this stuff).

I started by substituting u = 1/x to get an undeterminate form suitable for L'Hôpital. By doing so, lim x→0 becomes lim u→∞

lim x→0 xln(2x) = lim u→∞ ln(2/u) / u

Applying L'Hôpital:

= lim u→∞ (-u)/2u2

= lim u→∞ (-1)/2u

= 0


I know that's the right answer, but did I make any mistakes? Also, was I allowed to switch lim x→0 by lim u→∞? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, it's right. You didn't even really need a substitution. Write the original limit as ln(2x)/(1/x) which is equally indeterminant. Then l'Hopital gives (1/x)/(-1/x^2)=(-x). That's still 0.
 
Dick said:
Sure, it's right. You didn't even really need a substitution. Write the original limit as ln(2x)/(1/x) which is equally indeterminant. Then l'Hopital gives (1/x)/(-1/x^2)=(-x). That's still 0.

Oh right, that sure is simpler. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K