Did I do anything wrong in this limit evaluation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pylauzier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
pylauzier
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A problem in my book asks the reader to evaluate lim x→0 xln(2x) using L'Hôpital.

Homework Equations



None


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I got it right but I simply wanted to make sure I did no illegal manipulations (I'm self-studying this stuff).

I started by substituting u = 1/x to get an undeterminate form suitable for L'Hôpital. By doing so, lim x→0 becomes lim u→∞

lim x→0 xln(2x) = lim u→∞ ln(2/u) / u

Applying L'Hôpital:

= lim u→∞ (-u)/2u2

= lim u→∞ (-1)/2u

= 0


I know that's the right answer, but did I make any mistakes? Also, was I allowed to switch lim x→0 by lim u→∞? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, it's right. You didn't even really need a substitution. Write the original limit as ln(2x)/(1/x) which is equally indeterminant. Then l'Hopital gives (1/x)/(-1/x^2)=(-x). That's still 0.
 
Dick said:
Sure, it's right. You didn't even really need a substitution. Write the original limit as ln(2x)/(1/x) which is equally indeterminant. Then l'Hopital gives (1/x)/(-1/x^2)=(-x). That's still 0.

Oh right, that sure is simpler. Thanks again!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top