Did I Make a Mistake in my Coordinates? Help Needed!

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shafia Zahin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Coordinates
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correct labeling of coordinates for point B in a Cartesian plane, specifically whether the coordinates should be (a cos θ, a sin θ) or (-a cos θ, a sin θ). It is established that the labeling is correct as (a cos θ, a sin θ) when considering the properties of cosine in the second and third quadrants, where cos θ is negative for angles between π/2 and 3π/2. The confusion arises from treating the x-coordinate as a length without considering its position relative to the origin, necessitating a negative sign for the x-coordinate in certain contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian coordinates
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly cosine and sine
  • Familiarity with the unit circle and angle quadrants
  • Basic geometry concepts related to triangle construction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of trigonometric functions in different quadrants
  • Learn about the unit circle and its application in coordinate systems
  • Explore triangle construction techniques in geometry
  • Investigate the implications of coordinate transformations in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying trigonometry and geometry, as well as anyone involved in physics or engineering requiring a solid understanding of coordinate systems and trigonometric functions.

Shafia Zahin
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
In the attached pic,it is shown that the coordinates of point B are (a cos theta, a sin theta) ,but shouldn't it be (-a cos theta,a sin theta)? Can anybody please help?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170614_142305.jpg
    IMG_20170614_142305.jpg
    55 KB · Views: 532
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No there is nothing wrong with the labeling of the coordinates in the diagram. Recall that ##\cos \theta## is negative for ##\pi/2 < \theta < 3\pi/2## (or what you may know as the second and third quadrants).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Fightfish said:
No there is nothing wrong with the labeling of the coordinates in the diagram. Recall that ##\cos \theta## is negative for ##\pi/2 < \theta < 3\pi/2## (or what you may know as the second and third quadrants).
But didn't it come like this?(see the attachment)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170614_144504.jpg
    IMG_20170614_144504.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 473
When you did the triangle construction in your diagram, you treated ##x## there as a length, which only takes on positive values, but ignored its position relative to where the origin was defined. So, the x-coordinate of the point should in fact be the negative of the ##x## in your derivation.
 
Fightfish said:
When you did the triangle construction in your diagram, you treated ##x## there as a length, which only takes on positive values, but ignored its position relative to where the origin was defined. So, the x-coordinate of the point should in fact be the negative of the ##x## in your derivation.
Oh,now I got it,thank you so much:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
942
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K