I Did I Make a Mistake in my Coordinates? Help Needed!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct coordinates of point B, initially questioned as either (a cos theta, a sin theta) or (-a cos theta, a sin theta). Participants clarify that the labeling in the diagram is accurate, noting that cos theta is negative in the second and third quadrants. The confusion arises from treating the x-coordinate as a positive length without considering its position relative to the origin. Ultimately, the correct interpretation confirms that the x-coordinate should indeed be negative based on the defined origin. The clarification resolves the initial misunderstanding.
Shafia Zahin
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
In the attached pic,it is shown that the coordinates of point B are (a cos theta, a sin theta) ,but shouldn't it be (-a cos theta,a sin theta)? Can anybody please help?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170614_142305.jpg
    IMG_20170614_142305.jpg
    55 KB · Views: 516
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No there is nothing wrong with the labeling of the coordinates in the diagram. Recall that ##\cos \theta## is negative for ##\pi/2 < \theta < 3\pi/2## (or what you may know as the second and third quadrants).
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Fightfish said:
No there is nothing wrong with the labeling of the coordinates in the diagram. Recall that ##\cos \theta## is negative for ##\pi/2 < \theta < 3\pi/2## (or what you may know as the second and third quadrants).
But didn't it come like this?(see the attachment)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170614_144504.jpg
    IMG_20170614_144504.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 456
When you did the triangle construction in your diagram, you treated ##x## there as a length, which only takes on positive values, but ignored its position relative to where the origin was defined. So, the x-coordinate of the point should in fact be the negative of the ##x## in your derivation.
 
Fightfish said:
When you did the triangle construction in your diagram, you treated ##x## there as a length, which only takes on positive values, but ignored its position relative to where the origin was defined. So, the x-coordinate of the point should in fact be the negative of the ##x## in your derivation.
Oh,now I got it,thank you so much:smile:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top