Did i rearrange this equation correctly? (circular motion)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a bucket being whirled in a vertical circle with a mass of 2.00 kg and a radius of 1.10 m. The tension at the lowest point is given as 25.0 N. The correct formula to find the speed at the top of the circle is derived from the equation FT = -mv²/r + mg, leading to v = √((mg*r - FT*r)/m). The user expresses uncertainty about the rearrangement of the equation but ultimately seeks clarification on the correct method for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g = 9.81 m/s²)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of centripetal force in circular motion
  • Learn how to derive equations for tension in vertical circular motion
  • Explore the implications of speed and tension at different points in a circular path
  • Practice solving problems involving forces and motion in vertical circles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and circular motion, as well as educators looking for examples of tension and speed calculations in vertical circular dynamics.

SmallPub
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
d

Homework Statement

A bucket 2.00kg is whirled in a vertical circle of a radius 1.10m. At the lowest point of its motion the tension in the rope supporting the bucket is 25.0 N a) find the speed of the bucket b) how fast must the bucket move at the top of the circle so that the rope does not go slack?



Homework Equations

v=√gr , FT = -mv2/r + mg ,

g=9.81m/s^2
m=2.00kg
r=1.10m
FT= 25.0 N


The Attempt at a Solution

a) v=√rg = √1.10m x 9.81m/2^s = 3.28m/s

b) v=√FTr-mg/-m <----- I am not sure if i rearranged that correctly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you should show the steps in how you rearranged it. Go through every step, and you will see, that it is wrong.
 
hjelmgart said:
Maybe you should show the steps in how you rearranged it. Go through every step, and you will see, that it is wrong.
can you show the correct equation to find v?
 
FT = -mv^2/r + mg
FT - mg = -mv^2
(FT - mg)*r/m = -v^2
-(FT - mg)*r/m = v^2

v = sqrt(-(FT - mg)*r/m)
v = sqrt((mg*r - FT*r)/m)
 
Although I don't think that is the correct method for this problem, anyway. I didn't look too much into it, though, but I am guessing, you will get some complex number from this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K