Did someone construct one to the universe in modern times?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Speculatrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of a geometry that accurately represents the current understanding of the universe, particularly in relation to curved space. The original poster questions whether a comprehensive geometric framework has been developed or if existing models are merely approximations. Participants acknowledge that multiple geometries exist, but the correct one remains uncertain. A link to a promising model is provided, suggesting ongoing exploration in this area. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately modeling the universe's geometry.
Speculatrix
I have a question. I'm not even sure that it makes sense or is a worthy question, so please bear with me.

Is there a geometry written for the current (accepted) view of the universe? It seems there must be a geometry that deals with curved space and other such features, but I have never heard of one. For a while people were just sort-of writing geometries--just making up systems that worked whether they had been seen or not, right? It seems crazy that someone could (or would) write one that worked for our universe without knowing its details. Did someone construct one to the universe in modern times? Or have we just never needed a complete geometry? It seems we must be using some geometry, but I don't know what it is.

Thanks for any insight. (I realize my question was probably worded badly and therefore partially incoherent.)

-Speculatrix
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There are several, we don't jknow which is correct, but http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/universe_soccer_031008.html seems to show a lot of promise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Asteroid 2024 YR4 has a 1% risk of a multi-megaton impact in 2032 (now ruled out)'

Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Questions about relative Space-Time in the Universe
Replies
24
Views
2K
B What is empirically known about the shape and size of the Universe?
Replies
34
Views
6K
I The laws of thermodynamics and the Universe
Replies
16
Views
4K
B Acceleration of time due to entropy
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Number of stars in the universe over time
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Question regarding supermassive black holes in the early Universe
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Does my theory about black holes make sense ?
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Was the universe is infinitely large at the big bang?
Replies
11
Views
3K
I About the meaning of "expanding universe"
Replies
17
Views
2K
I There must be a center of the universe....?
3
Replies
106
Views
11K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top