Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the appropriateness of notifying reference writers about the outcome of a scholarship application, specifically when the applicant did not receive the award. Participants explore the implications of such communication and the etiquette involved in maintaining relationships with references.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that since thank you emails were already sent, no further communication is necessary.
- Others argue that informing references about the outcome, even if negative, is acceptable and can help maintain a good relationship for future references.
- One participant expresses concern that notifying references might make them feel at fault for the outcome.
- Another viewpoint emphasizes that if the scholarship had been awarded, it would be polite to inform and thank the references again.
- Some participants advocate for not informing references, suggesting it may not be beneficial and could create awkwardness.
- A participant notes the potential value of keeping in touch with references, regardless of the outcome.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants present multiple competing views on whether to notify references about the scholarship outcome, with no consensus reached on the best course of action.
Contextual Notes
Participants express varying degrees of concern about the potential implications of communication, including feelings of blame and the importance of maintaining professional relationships.