Diesel Cycle Help: P,T @ Start & End Head Addition

  • Thread starter Thread starter SF2K4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle Diesel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a Diesel cycle problem where the pressure and temperature at the start of compression and the end of head addition are given. The main challenge is determining the temperature or volume at State 2, which is essential for further calculations regarding cycle ratios and thermal efficiencies. The use of entropy relationships and variable specific heats complicates the process, as specific heat is temperature-dependent. Additionally, there is a consideration of whether to use the Peng-Robinson equation of state instead of the ideal gas assumption, which would complicate calculations but may not significantly alter thermal efficiency for low pressure values. The consensus suggests starting with ideal gas assumptions for initial calculations, followed by potential experimental work for more complex scenarios.
SF2K4
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The pressure and temperature at the beginning of compression in an air-standard Diesel cycle are 95 kPa and 300K. At the end of the head addition process, the pressure is 7.2 MPa and 2150 K. Assume variable specific heats.

I'm not going to list the parts because all of the questions rely on knowing the V and T of State 2, which I cannot find.


2. Homework Equations


I know that P_2 = P_3 = 7.2 MPa. I also know that s_2 = s_1 = 1.70203 kJ/kg*K


3. The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea. In order to do anything, find cycle ratios or thermal effiencies relating to the compression or head addition stage, I NEED to either know the Temperature of State 2 or the Volume or Volume Ratio of State 2, which I need the Temperature of to find it on the table, or both. Basically without the Temperature of State 2 I cannot finish this problem and I don't know what I'm missing.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
So for an ideal gas we can write an entropy relationship like the following:

ds = c_v\frac{dT}{T}-R\frac{dp}{p}

Integrating this yields:

s_2-s_1=\int_1^2c_v\frac{dT}{T}-Rln\frac{p2}{p1}

The trouble is \mbox{c_v} is a function of temperature!

So, \mbox{\int_1^2c_v\frac{dT}{T}} can be re-written as \mbox{s_o^2-s_o^1}. These quantities are tabulated for air so you should be able to bridge the gap between states 1 and 2 and find your temperature.

The rest of the cycle should just fall into place. Just remember you may need to utilize other independent equations, like the 1st law or the ideal gas law to get everything you need.
P.S. It is likely that a post like this should be put in HW help in the future.
 
Hi there:

Here are two URLs on the Diesel Cycle operation.

Technical background information on Diesel Cycle
http://members.aol.com/engware/cycles.htm

Online calculator on Diesel Cycle operation
http://members.aol.com/engware/calc4.htm

The provided URLs should help you with Diesel Cycle technical background information and engineering calculations regarding the Diesel Cyucle operation and/or technical performance evaluation.

Here are two plots regarding the Diesel Cycle thermal efficiency and power output.

Slide50.GIF


Slide51.GIF


Thanks,

Gordan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i want to ask a question about the cycle... What if we use Peng -Robinson Equation of state instead of ideal gas assumption for nitrogen for example? Calculations gets very complicated when i move into second to third and third to fourth steps...
 
Hi there:

In terms of the thermal efficiency definition, nothing changes.

Give a try and see what happens.

In my opinion, there should be no major changes for low pressure values in terms of the operating conditions and final numeric values. However, as you indicated, the equations get complicated and the relationships for isentropic processes are no longer as simple and straight forward as in the case of ideal gas equation assumptions.

Therefore, my suggestion is to go with ideal gas assumptions, do the calculations and you know what it is for the ideal case conditions. One can always try to do different things theoretically and numerically. However, if you what to invest more time, experimental work needs to be done as well as experimental measurements.

In my opinion that would be the way to go -- do ideal case numerical calculations and some experimental work and show both sets of results.

Thanks,

Gordan
 
Last edited:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top