Diff EQ with the boundary conditions

Warr
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I took an ODE course last year, but I seem to have forgotten some stuff. I need to solve this equation:

\frac{d^2u}{dt^2} + {\omega}^2u = f_osin({\mu}t)

with the boundry conditions:

u(0) = 0, du/dt(0) = 0

When I tried to solve the homogenenous equation first, I got

u_g(t)=c_1e^{i{\omega}t}+c_2e^{-i{\omega}t}

I then differentiated and set up the system with the two boundy conditions...but I got c1+c2=0 and c1-c2=0...c1=c2=0.

This seems wrong. Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think those might be called initial conditions, not boundary conditions, not that it matters. Anyways, you need to find a particular solution, add it to your ug, then find the ci by looking at the initial conditions.
 
Here is what I did now:

let the particular solution be of the form u_p=Asin({\mu}t})

differentiated twices gives u_p''=-A{\mu}^2sin({\mu}t})

so now from my origional diff eq I get

A({\omega}^2-{\mu}^2)sin({\mu}t)=f_osin({\mu}t)

henceA = \frac{f_o}{{\omega}^2-{\mu}^2}

and therefore

u_p=\frac{f_o}{{\omega}^2-{\mu}^2}sin({\mu}t})

so now the general solution is

u=c_1e^{i{\omega}t}+c_2e^{-i{\omega}t}+\frac{f_o}{{\omega}^2-{\mu}^2}sin({\mu}t})

plugging in the initial conditions from the first post, I got

c_1=\frac{{\mu}f_o}{2({\mu}^2-{\omega}^2)}

c_2=-\frac{{\mu}f_o}{2({\mu}^2-{\omega}^2)}

and therefore the entire solution to be

u=\frac{{\mu}f_o}{2({\mu}^2-{\omega}^2)}e^{i{\omega}t}-\frac{{\mu}f_o}{2({\mu}^2-{\omega}^2)}e^{-i{\omega}t}+\frac{f_o}{{\omega}^2-{\mu}^2}sin({\mu}t})
 
Last edited:
I think you're missing a factor of i\omega in the denominators of c1 and c2.
 
You are right. Also, is it right to say that the solution exists as long as |\mu| {\neq} |\omega| (assuming that they are both real)?

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
If you are going to use sin(\mu t) as you particular solution, why not use sin(\omega t) and cos(\omega t) in the general solution?

Yes, the solution is what you have as long as |\mu|\ne|\omega|. However, if you are thinking that when they are equal, a solution does not exist, that is not necessarily so. You just need to use a more complicated function as your specific solution.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top