Differantiation proof question

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Physics news on Phys.org
Well good, you got quite far. Look at where your limits got you to. You can take out the \phi (x) out from the limits now can't you? Your remaining limit, what does that approach from the left? How about from the right?
 
Last edited:
i can't take out
\phi (x)

out of the limit .
its not a constant
??
 
Well really it doesn't matter whether you leave it in there or not, its still easy to see that we get different limits from the left and right just by considering the other things in the limit. But we can take it out of the limit because we can regard it as a constant with respect to the limiting variable.
 
i can't see
how we get different results

there is another function inside
i don't know how to get a result
??
 
Consider

\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{ |x| }{x}. What is it from the left? How about right? So it does exist?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top