Difference between 2n and (2n) ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between factorials, particularly addressing the equation (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2n+1)*(2n)!. It emphasizes that (2n+2)! cannot be simplified to (2n+2)*2n! because the latter does not account for the additional multiplicative factors from (2n+1) down to 1. Additionally, it distinguishes between 2n! and (2n)!, explaining that 2n! represents twice the value of n!, while (2n)! is the factorial of all integers up to 2n. An example illustrates that while 2*3! equals 12, (2*3)! equals 720, highlighting the difference in definitions. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for solving problems involving factorials correctly.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
hey. I've had no education in factorials specifically, but my professor is expecting us to already know this stuff...

In a problem where factorials are included, it is claimed (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2n+1)*(2n)!. Shouldn't it be (2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?

In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. "(2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?" No, why?

2. "In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?"

2*n! is twice the value of n!
(2n!) is the factorial up to the number 2n

For example, 2*3! =12, whereas (2*3)!=6!=720
 
Nikitin said:
hey. I've had no education in factorials specifically, but my professor is expecting us to already know this stuff...

In a problem where factorials are included, it is claimed (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2n+1)*(2n)!. Shouldn't it be (2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?

In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?

What is a factorial? n! is defined as being all the positive integers up to and including n being multiplied together, so n! = n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1

Ok, using this idea, what would (2n+2)! be? Well, first we multiply by (2n+2), then we reduce the value by 1 and multiply by that, so we multiply by ((2n+2)-1) = (2n+1).

Yes,
2n! = 2*(n!) = 2*(n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1)

while
(2n)! = (2n)(2n-1)(2n-2)...*3*2*1
 
arildno said:
1. "(2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?" No, why?

2. "In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?"

2*n! is twice the value of n!
(2n!) is the factorial up to the number 2n

For example, 2*3! =12, whereas (2*3)!=6!=720

1. Doesn't (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2(n-1)+2)*(2(n-2)+2)!

2. Ah yes. How could I miss that? damn, i guess I'm exhausted.

What is a factorial? n! is defined as being all the positive integers up to and including n being multiplied together, so n! = n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1

Ok, using this idea, what would (2n+2)! be? Well, first we multiply by (2n+2), then we reduce the value by 1 and multiply by that, so we multiply by ((2n+2)-1) = (2n+1).

Yes,
2n! = 2*(n!) = 2*(n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1)

while
(2n)! = (2n)(2n-1)(2n-2)...*3*2*1

ah, OK. thanks 4 the help
 
Nikitin said:
1. Doesn't (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2(n-1)+2)*(2(n-2)+2)!

I have a feeling you might be getting this mixed up with the techniques you learned in Mathematical induction?

Let's give n a value, say, n=5

(2n+2)! = (2*5+2)! = 12! = 12*11*...*3*2

Now, 2(n-1)+2 = 2*4+2 = 10.
Notice how 10 is 2 less than 12, because we didn't take 1 away from the value 12, we took a value away from n, which is being multiplied by 2, so if we followed what you wrote we'd end up with 12! = 12*10*8*6*4*2

Essentially, if we have a linear equation an+b for some constants a and b, then an+b-1 \neq a(n-1)+b unless a = 1.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top