MHB Difference between a(t), a(v) and a(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joel Jacon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between $a(t)$, $a(v)$, and $a(x)$ in terms of acceleration. $a(t)$ represents acceleration with respect to time, defined as $a(t) = \d{v}{dt}$. In contrast, $a(v)$ and $a(x)$ are not simply derivatives of velocity or position; rather, $a(v)$ can be expressed as $a(t(v))$, indicating acceleration as a function of time related to velocity, while $a(x)$ is similarly defined as $a(t(x))$. This distinction emphasizes that acceleration can be analyzed through different variables, each providing unique insights into motion. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately describing dynamics in physics.
Joel Jacon
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between $a(t)$, $a(v)$ and $a(x)$? If $a(t) = \d{v}{dt}$ then what will $a(v)$ and $a(x)$ equal to?

$a(t)$ is acceleration with change in time

$a(v)$ is acceleration with change in velocity

$a(x)$ is acceleration with change in position
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pcforgeek said:
What is the difference between $a(t)$, $a(v)$ and $a(x)$? If $a(t) = \d{v}{dt}$ then what will $a(v)$ and $a(x)$ equal to?

$a(t)$ is acceleration with change in time

$a(v)$ is acceleration with change in velocity

$a(x)$ is acceleration with change in position

Hi pcforgeek! ;)

I believe you already have the difference.We can indeed say that $a(t) = \d{v}{t}$, but generally $a(x) \ne \d{v}{x}$ and $a(v) \ne \d{v}{v}$.

The best I can say about $a(v)$ is that $a(v) = a(t(v))$ , where $t(v)$ is the function that says at which time we have speed $v$.
Similarly $a(x) = a(t(x))$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top