Difference between Civil Engineering Physics and non C.E. Physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the differences between Civil Engineering Physics and a traditional Physics degree, particularly in the context of educational programs in Sweden. Participants explore the implications of choosing one path over the other, including potential career outcomes and the nature of the coursework involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the distinction between Civil Engineering Physics and a standard Physics degree.
  • One participant notes that Civil Engineers typically focus on designing infrastructure such as roads and bridges, suggesting that Civil Engineering Physics would involve physics relevant to these structures.
  • Others argue that a Physics degree may cover a broader range of topics, including modern physics and quantum mechanics, which may not be as emphasized in Civil Engineering Physics.
  • A participant highlights that the difficulty of admission to the Civil Engineering Physics program is significantly higher, prompting questions about which program might be "better."
  • Concerns are raised about the potential career paths for graduates of each program, with some suggesting that those interested in pure physics should consider a traditional Physics degree instead of Civil Engineering.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the terminology used in Swedish educational contexts, particularly the term "Civilingenjör" and its implications for degree classification.
  • One participant mentions that Engineering Physics programs often include more mathematics and engineering courses compared to standard Physics programs, which could influence the choice of study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which program is superior or more suitable, as opinions vary based on personal interests and career aspirations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the specific courses and focus areas can differ significantly between universities, which may affect the decision-making process. Additionally, there is uncertainty about the career trajectories for graduates of each program.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a degree in Civil Engineering Physics versus a traditional Physics program, particularly those interested in the implications of each choice for their future careers.

Okki2
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Whats the difference? i know that after 3 years you become a c.e. but what about the other one? Dont know which one to apply for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nobody wants to answer?
 
Hello, I am a civil engineer doing a MSc in Transportation Engineering.

I don't understand your question. What do you mean?
 
I could take Civil Engineering in Physics (aka technical physics) its 5years or i could take physics in university which doesn't give a civil engineering degree.

Here is the civil engineering description:
http://www.kth.se/studies/swedish-programmes/msc/1.7784?l=en_UK

The other one is just called Physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So what you're asking is what is the difference between being a civil engineering degree and physics?
 
yes C.E in physics and physics.
 
Well civil engineers design roads, airports, bridges, dams etc. So logically CE physics would be the physics of those structures. You would mostly cover statics and solids, heat transfer, oscillations, wave theory etc... However, physics is just what it says, physics. My guess is the program you are looking at could be diverse and include some of the aforementioned topics and more, such as modern physics, intro to quantum mech, electricity and other cool stuff physicists do.

Oh and thermodynamics would be common to them both

But upperlevel classes in that school for CE physics is anyone's guess though but I just listed a few focus topics
 
hmm which one is better? cause getting into the ce physics programm is 10times harder.
 
I can't give you the answer to that, you have to answer a few questions for yourself first.

Do you like Engineering? Do you want to be an engineer in any way? Even if it were simply a CE physicist.

What about physics? Do you like physics more? Do you want to be a 'pure' physicist?
 
  • #10
Okki2 said:
I could take Civil Engineering in Physics (aka technical physics) its 5years or i could take physics in university which doesn't give a civil engineering degree.

Here is the civil engineering description:
http://www.kth.se/studies/swedish-programmes/msc/1.7784?l=en_UK

The other one is just called Physics.

This link is Engineering Physics...

Engineering Physics is not Civil Engineering... well ok, THEY DIFFER in some courses.

http://www.kth.se/studies/swedish-programmes/msc/1.7601?l=en_UK <- That is the CE program.


Well, i don't know what physics engineers do (probably go to grad school like the physicists...), but it probably is very different from what Civil Engineers do.

Civil engineers use their knowledge to solve structural challenges (buildings, dams, roads, etc..), to solve transportation phenomena (traffic congestion, public transit systems, ...), to solve water resources management problems (aqueducts design, ...), focus on environmental concerns (Waste water treatment, ...), and many more.

If you want to study Civil engineering because of its physics then you should not pick Civil engineering... Study PHYSICS.

Good luck
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Hmm good point there
 
  • #12
There is no such as "Civil Engineering Physics", my guess is that Okki2 is Swedish (since the link was to KTH) and he/she is confusing the term "Civilingenjör" (which literally translates to Civil Engineering, but actually means something that is roughly an MSc, quite similar to the German "DiplomIngenieur") with "Civil Engineering" (which would be "Civilingenjör i Väg&Vatten" in Swedish).

What courses you need to take to get a MSc in Engineering Physics differs from university to university. But Engineering Physics Chalmers and KTH in Sweden it essentially an "advanced" degree where you in addition to physics take a lot of math courses (more than in an ordinary Physics Program) +some engineering courses (some electronics, control theory etc). During the second part of the program you start to specialize and there is nothing stopping you from going into theoretical physics; i.e. it doesn't have to be "applied" physics in any sense (e.g. Max Tegmark studied at KTH, and I don't think anyone would call what he is doing "applied") .

I would hesitate to call Engineering Physics an "elite education" but it certainly has that reputation if you study at KTH/Chalmers. Most PhD students (and researchers) in Physics in Sweden studied engineering physics as undergraduates, so F at KTH/Chalmers is definitely a good idea if you are planning to pursue a career in academic research.
 
  • #13
djeitnstine said:
I can't give you the answer to that, you have to answer a few questions for yourself first.

Do you like Engineering? Do you want to be an engineer in any way? Even if it were simply a CE physicist.

What about physics? Do you like physics more? Do you want to be a 'pure' physicist?

i don't like anything except eating popcorn and watching steve wilkos. but i have to choose.
 
  • #14
thanks for the info guys...you've been a big help.

What do you guys know about Stockholm University and their physics program?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K