Difference between coefficient of static and kinet friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the difference between static and kinetic friction coefficients in a pulley system scenario. It explains that the force of static friction can vary from zero up to a maximum value defined by the coefficient of static friction, μs, multiplied by the normal force. The equation mg = ffs only applies when the block is on the verge of moving, not when it is stationary. Once the block begins to move, the force of kinetic friction, represented by μk, comes into play, which is typically lower than μs. This distinction highlights the conditions under which each coefficient applies and the nature of frictional forces.
bookerdewitt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Lets say you have a block on a horizontal surface connected to a pulley and then a weight hanging over the edge. If its not moving then the force applied which is just the mass of the weight x gravity is equal to the force of static friction μsmblockg. So that means μs = the mass of the weight/the mass of the block. But if the block is moving at a constant velocity wouldn't the force applied also equal the force of kinetic friction which would mean the μk also equals the ratio of the masses? I thought the coefficient of static friction is always higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction? Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bookerdewitt said:
If its not moving then the force applied which is just the mass of the weight x gravity is equal to the force of static friction μsmblockg.
No. The static friction coefficient tells you the maximal static friction force, for a given normal force. The actual static friction force can be anything between 0 and that value.
 
So mg=ffs would only hold if the block is just starting to move?
 
bookerdewitt said:
So mg=ffs would only hold if the block is just starting to move?

Yeah, dude. The expression for static friction is Fs ≤ μsN, where N is the normal force, and μs is the coeff. of static friction. So, μsN is the maximum static friction that can be provided. Anytime before the maximum static friction is overcome and the object starts moving, the static friction force is less than that, because it is only whatever value it needs to be to prevent motion, given the other applied forces on the body.
 
No. mg=ffs would hold but ffs = mu * N wouldn't.
 
Ok. That makes sense.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I If frictional force in system is <= us*N then there is no slipping
Replies
7
Views
2K
Difference between static and kinetic friction
Replies
10
Views
3K
B Why is static friction necessary for pure rolling?
Replies
4
Views
3K
B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
Why is rolling easier than sliding?
2
Replies
71
Views
10K
Understanding Friction and Tension in Static vs. Dynamic Scenarios
Replies
18
Views
2K
B What Happens When The Applied Force Equals the Static Friction Force?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Does coefficient of static friction change with angle
Replies
4
Views
13K
I Determine if the block will slide or flip over after contact
Replies
8
Views
2K
Static coefficient of friction decreasing with normal force?
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top