Difference between coefficient of static and kinet friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the difference between static and kinetic friction coefficients in a pulley system scenario. It explains that the force of static friction can vary from zero up to a maximum value defined by the coefficient of static friction, μs, multiplied by the normal force. The equation mg = ffs only applies when the block is on the verge of moving, not when it is stationary. Once the block begins to move, the force of kinetic friction, represented by μk, comes into play, which is typically lower than μs. This distinction highlights the conditions under which each coefficient applies and the nature of frictional forces.
bookerdewitt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Lets say you have a block on a horizontal surface connected to a pulley and then a weight hanging over the edge. If its not moving then the force applied which is just the mass of the weight x gravity is equal to the force of static friction μsmblockg. So that means μs = the mass of the weight/the mass of the block. But if the block is moving at a constant velocity wouldn't the force applied also equal the force of kinetic friction which would mean the μk also equals the ratio of the masses? I thought the coefficient of static friction is always higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction? Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bookerdewitt said:
If its not moving then the force applied which is just the mass of the weight x gravity is equal to the force of static friction μsmblockg.
No. The static friction coefficient tells you the maximal static friction force, for a given normal force. The actual static friction force can be anything between 0 and that value.
 
So mg=ffs would only hold if the block is just starting to move?
 
bookerdewitt said:
So mg=ffs would only hold if the block is just starting to move?

Yeah, dude. The expression for static friction is Fs μsN, where N is the normal force, and μs is the coeff. of static friction. So, μsN is the maximum static friction that can be provided. Anytime before the maximum static friction is overcome and the object starts moving, the static friction force is less than that, because it is only whatever value it needs to be to prevent motion, given the other applied forces on the body.
 
No. mg=ffs would hold but ffs = mu * N wouldn't.
 
Ok. That makes sense.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top