Difference between curvilinear and rotational motion

In summary, the solution states that there's no rotational motion when ##C## is cut (the motion is curvilinear), so we can take torques with respect to the centre of mass of the plate. But, isn't it rotating? I think of it as a pendulum, which describes a circular motion. What's the difference? Wouldn't the plate oscillate like a pendulum, describing the arc of a circle?The difference is that a pendulum has a restoring force that keeps it in equilibrium, whereas a rotating object does not.
  • #1
Homework Statement
The picture shows a plate of mass ##750 kg##, whose centre of mass is in ##O##. Determine the tension in ##A## and ##B## after ##C## is cut.
Relevant Equations
##\Sigma \tau =I \alpha##
##\Sigma F=ma##
The solution states that there's no rotational motion when ##C## is cut (the motion is curvilinear), so we can take torques with respect to the centre of mass of the plate. But, isn't it rotating? I think of it as a pendulum, which describes a circular motion. What's the difference? Wouldn't the plate oscillate like a pendulum, describing the arc of a circle?
 

Attachments

  • 20200827_124237.jpg
    20200827_124237.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 92
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Like Tony Stark said:
What's the difference?
It doesn't rotate: the angle of e.g. AB wrt the horizontal does not change
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark
  • #3
BvU said:
It doesn't rotate: the angle of e.g. AB wrt the horizontal does not change
I would clarify this and say that because AB wrt the horizontal doesn't change, the block does not rotate about its CM. Nevertheless the block's CM rotates wrt some point in the sense that the angle between the strings and the vertical changes wrt time. By contrast, a pendulum suspended by a single string rotates both about its CM and the point of support. Just like the Moon shows the same face to the Earth by making one revolution about the Earth in the same time it makes one revolution about its axis, the one-string pendulum shows the same face to the point of support.
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark and Lnewqban
  • #4
Back in elementary school we were taught to use the term "rotation" for the circular motion of a rigid object such as a satellite about its own center of mass and "revolution" for the [near-] circular motion of a satellite about its primary.
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark and etotheipi
  • #5
jbriggs444 said:
Back in elementary school we were taught to use the term "rotation" for the circular motion of a rigid object such as a satellite about its own center of mass and "revolution" for the [near-] circular motion of a satellite about its primary.
It's a good distinction whereas "orbital" and "spin" (angular momentum) are more physicky.
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark
  • #6
kuruman said:
Nevertheless the block's CM rotates wrt some point in the sense that the angle between the strings and the vertical changes wrt time.

That's my doubt. Doesn't the centre of mass of the plate oscillate like the ball of the pendulum?
 
  • #7
No. It stays 'upright'.
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark
  • #8
Like Tony Stark said:
That's my doubt. Doesn't the centre of mass of the plate oscillate like the ball of the pendulum?
The center of mass moves back and forth in an arc. Yes.

The plate does not change it orientation during this movement. It stays upright at all times.
 
  • Like
Likes Like Tony Stark
  • #9
jbriggs444 said:
The center of mass moves back and forth in an arc. Yes.

The plate does not change it orientation during this movement. It stays upright at all times.
I got it. Thanks.
And what if I want to calculate the period of its centre of mass? Should I treat all the system as a simple pendulum?
 
  • #10
Why not draw a FBD, derive the equation of motion and see if it is the same as that of a simple pendulum?
 
  • Like
Likes BvU

Suggested for: Difference between curvilinear and rotational motion

Replies
30
Views
289
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
893
Replies
3
Views
660
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top