Difference between Newtonian, Langrange, and Hamiltonian Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Newtonian mechanics focuses on forces and vectors, while Lagrangian mechanics shifts the perspective to energy and scalars, simplifying problem-solving in complex systems. Hamiltonian mechanics further refines Lagrangian principles, transforming equations of motion into one-dimensional differential equations. Both Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics are categorized as analytical mechanics, emphasizing a more conceptual and mathematical approach. While these advanced methods provide valuable insights, they may not always be practical for all physics problems. Overall, understanding these mechanics enhances comprehension of classical physics, but one should balance exploration with practical applications.
Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3
Hey I was just wondering what the differences between the three forms of mechanics were. I've only studied basic Newtonian mechanics so I'm not really sure about the other two. Could anyone elaborate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not different in the sense you imply. Lagrangian mechanics is a further development of Newtonian dynamics, and Hamilton's work is based on Lagrange principles. So they form a progression.

It is a very large, important and fascinating field of study so it wouldn't be practical to teach it here. I recommend any decent book on classical mechanics, which will take you through the progression.
 
Last edited:
Mechanics is mechanics. Lagrange and Hamilton mechanics are both known as analytical mechanics. The treatment is just more conceptual and more mathematical. It depends if you like formalism. Anyway, give it a try: sometimes it is easier (especially for systems with several degrees of freedom) to solve a problem with these tools rather than with a (in fact: several coupled) Newton equation, which quickly becomes cumbersome. Have a look to Landau or Goldstein books. To be honest, I should however say that analytical mechanics is nice, it gives a lot of insights and concepts, but it is not so useful in the end. Don't get too fascinated by this kind of stuff, and don't loose too much time (physics is wide !).
 
Last edited:
diff. between these mechanics

see Newtonion mechanics deals with vectors like mom. and acc. but then came lagrangian mech. which deals in terms of energies which are scalars and hence equations are easy to solve. but these eqns. are second order differential eqns. .to improve on that and mke eqn. of motion a one dimensional diff. eqn. hamiltonian mech. is introduced.
 
Thanks, everyone, especially nandan!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top