Difference between outbursts and flares in X-ray accreting binaries

  • Thread starter Thread starter RHK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference X-ray
AI Thread Summary
In X-ray accreting binaries, "outbursts" and "flares" represent different types of transient events. Flares are characterized by brief periods of enhanced X-ray emission, while outbursts can last longer, such as superbursts that extend for hours. The distinction may also involve the origin of the X-ray emission, with "type I" events linked to the surface and "type II" events associated with the accretion disk. Understanding the context of these events is crucial, as the specific terminology may vary in the literature. Clarity on these terms can enhance comprehension of X-ray emission phenomena in neutron stars.
RHK
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello to everybody.

I am studying the accreting neutron stars (pulsars) in the X-ray band.
Reading a number of papers, I noticed that there are two kinds of transients: the "outbursts" and the "flares".
Unfortunately, I still don't understand what is the difference between them, if it is.

Anyone can help me?
Thanks in advance
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It has been a little while since I've done research on X-ray emission from neutron stars, but a possible difference might be the timescale of the event. Flares tend to imply a brief period of enhanced X-ray emission, where an outburst does not have to mean brief (ex: superburst last for hours). But I wouldn't get too hung up on this nomenclature. I'm also saying that I don't know the difference as used in the literature.

There are other discriminators between types of X-ray events in these systems. I believe that people often refer to "type I" or "type II" events, which refer to the origin of the X-ray emission (surface/accretion disk respectively, I think). So long as you are aware of the context of the event, the designations aren't the most important things.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top