Difference between particle horizon and cosmological event horizon?

AI Thread Summary
The Particle Horizon defines the observable limit of the universe, indicating what can be seen today, while the Cosmological Event Horizon represents the ultimate limit of what may ever be observed, regardless of time. The Event Horizon is influenced by the universe's geometry and expansion history. Discussions highlight the confusion surrounding these concepts, particularly regarding the observable universe and the surface of last scattering. Some suggest that super-hubble fluctuations could leave imprints on the Cosmic Microwave Background, though this remains debatable. Understanding these horizons is crucial for grasping the limits of cosmic observation.
touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between particle horizon and cosmological event horizon?
 
Space news on Phys.org
touqra said:
What is the difference between particle horizon and cosmological event horizon?
The Particle Horizon is the limit of what we can see today, (it takes longer than the present age of the universe for light to reach us from beyond the PH), the Event Horizon is the limit of what we may ever see, even if we wait for ever. (the EH is determined by the geometry and expansion history of the universe)

Garth
 
Garth said:
the Event Horizon is the limit of what we may ever see, even if we wait for ever. (the EH is determined by the geometry and expansion history of the universe)

Garth

Could you elaborate further on the Cosmological EH?
 
The horizons thing creates more confusion than clarity, IMO. In our [observable] universe, the surface of last scattering is the observational limit - again IMO. Super-hubble fluctuations may have left trace imprints on the CMB - albeit that is debatable - but in a temporally bounded BB universe, it is impossible to observe entities that [may or may not have] existed prior to recombination.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Back
Top