Difference Between Sigma & Lambda Baryons

  • Thread starter Thread starter barrinmw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baryons Particles
barrinmw
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
While doing my homework for physics, we are doing what quarks make up different baryons and such and I can across something I don't understand, what is the difference between a neutral sigma baryon and a neutral lambda baryon? They both have an up down and strange quark combination and the sigma decays into the lambda with the release of a gamma, so why is it considered a separate particle? Shouldn't a neutral sigma be considered an excited neutral lambda?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They have different wavefunctions, and so are different particles.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top