Water Displacement: Floating vs Submerged Objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the difference in water displacement between floating and submerged objects. For a submerged object, the volume of water displaced equals the object's volume. In contrast, a floating object displaces a volume of water that weighs the same as the object. The object's density is only necessary to determine whether it will float, as it must be less than the density of water. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications in physics and engineering.
kuhatelyn
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
difference between the amount of water displaced by a floating vs submerged object??

I'm so confused.

Let's say you have the mass and density of a floating object. How would you find the volume of the water displaced? And how is this different from finding the volume of water displaced by the object if it were submerged?

PLEASE HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For a submerged object, the volume of water displaced is equal to the volume of the object.

For a floating object, it will displace a water weight equal to the object weight.

So you don't need to know the density of the object, except to verify if it is greater than or less than the density of water. That determines if it will float or not. But you will also need to know the density of the water.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top