Difference between types of explosives (contact vs spark/flame)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ascendant78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between various types of explosives, particularly focusing on the concept of activation energy required to initiate an explosion. It highlights that explosives like nitroglycerin can detonate with low activation energy, while others may require a spark or high temperature. The conversation delves into the mechanics of ignition, questioning whether heat, the nature of the reacting materials, or both play a role in initiating a reaction. It is noted that some materials can ignite without a flame if the ambient temperature is sufficiently high, referencing concepts like spontaneous combustion and autoignition. The importance of energy input, whether through heat or localized energy from a spark, is emphasized, explaining how these factors influence the initiation and progression of explosive reactions. The participants express gratitude for the shared insights and resources that clarify these complex topics.
Ascendant78
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
I have done some research online about this, but have not found a clear-cut answer. I am wondering what the difference is between different types of explosives? Like how nitroglycerin can explode simply through impact, while other explosives require a spark, and others electricity. I am assuming it is all about what is required to cause the activation for the explosion, but I am just trying to get a better grip of what we only briefly skimmed over in chemistry. Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I would say it is mainly a matter of the activation energy. Low activation energy and some rubbing is enough, high activation energy and you need a high temperature to start the reaction.

There can be some fine print to that.
 
Borek said:
I would say it is mainly a matter of the activation energy. Low activation energy and some rubbing is enough, high activation energy and you need a high temperature to start the reaction.

There can be some fine print to that.

Thanks for the information. I guess one of the things I'm wondering about is exactly what causes a reaction from a spark or flame? Is it about the heat, is it about the reaction occurring when something is ignited, or does the activation depend more on exactly what is being reacted with that heat source? For example, are there some materials that don't necessarily need a flame or spark to ignite if the temperature of the air alone is high enough? I'm assuming the answer to this is yes, but since I'm not sure of the exact reaction, I'm really not sure?
 
Adding energy, usually in the form of heat, is enough to ignite your mixture. When you only add heat to say a hydrogen-air mixture, you will reach the activation energy for the decomposition reaction of hydrogen: H2 -> H+H. This will then further react with oxygen, causing a chain branching reaction that will result in the complete oxidation of hydrogen (to water mostly).

With spark ignition, you also add energy, but you only add it in a small volume so the reaction starts locally. Also, sparks create plasma's (the local energy can be quite high) so some reactions in the chain branching are different because you immediately reach much higher activation energies.
 
Finally got a chance to take a look at this (had finals). Great links 256bits, and also great information from you too bigfooted. After looking into all the information you two provided, it all makes much more sense to me. Thank you!
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top