Difference hard / semi-hard scattering

earth2
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

another question.
What is the difference between hard and semi-hard scattering events?
In terms of energy I found for both s >> t, so where does the difference lie?

Thanks,
Earth's
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be more specific, where did read "semi-hard", what was the context ? To my knowledge, this is used in hadronic collisions when the virtuality of the involved partons is large compared to lambda_QCD but small compared to s.
 
Ok, i just found the answer here: http://www-subatech.in2p3.fr/~photons/subatech/physics/potpourri/node23.html

hard: truly perturbative
semi-hard: perturbative + non-perturbative effects

Thanks anyway!
earth2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the plot in your link A+B->C+X is referred to as "hard scattering" and explicitly shows vertex (or structure) functions which are non-perturbative.

No matter what you do with QCD, you will always have confinement at least on one side (that is, you may not have it only in a plasma). Confinement is non-perturbative.

Your link says
By hard processes one usually means clearly perturbative processes with momentum or mass scales of the order of several tens of GeV.
[...]
Semi-hard processes refers to QCD-processes where partons with transverse momenta of a few GeV are produced.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top