What Makes the North and South Magnetic Poles Unique?

AI Thread Summary
The North and South magnetic poles are defined by their alignment with magnetic dipoles, which can be understood through two primary models: the Gilbert model and the Ampere model. The Gilbert model describes magnets as consisting of tiny dipoles with fictitious magnetic charges, resulting in distinct north and south poles. In contrast, the Ampere model views magnetic dipoles as tiny current loops, suggesting that there are no true north and south poles, as internal currents cancel out. Both models produce similar external magnetic fields, but they differ significantly in their internal field representations. Understanding these models clarifies the unique characteristics of the magnetic poles.
Physicist50
Gold Member
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what the difference in the magnetic poles north and south is and what makes them unique.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicist50 said:
I was wondering what the difference in the magnetic poles north and south is and what makes them unique.

One is North and the other is South.
 
Indeed, but what makes one magnet north and one magnet south? Is there a difference in atomic or molecular structure, or the way they work?
 
Physicist50 said:
Indeed, but what makes one magnet north and one magnet south? Is there a difference in atomic or molecular structure, or the way they work?
They are fictitious entities that correspond to what is commonly known as the Gilbert model of a magnetic dipole. It treats magnetic material as consisting of tiny dipoles comprised of fictitious point magnetic charges (monopoles), in analogy with real electric dipoles that can exist in a dielectric material. When such dipoles are uniformly aligned along say a bar magnet, one face is then considered to be exposed to north magnetic charges, the other to south magnetic charges. This picture is consistent with the correct external magnetic field generated by such a permanent magnet - although in real magnets magnetization is never completely uniform and the 'magnetic charge' distribution is somewhat more complicated than just charges at each end face.

A rival Ampere model is considered more fundamental as it provides a picture closer to what is actually thought to apply to real intrinsic magnetic dipoles. It treats the fundamental dipoles as composed of tiny current loops, and when these are aligned in a bar magnet, internal currents essentially cancel, leaving surface currents on the side surfaces that correspond to a solenoidal distribution. There is then no north and south poles. The Ampere model gives the same external field as Gilbert model, but yields a very different result for the internal field. Normally this doesn't matter as only the external region is accessible. Wikipedia has some good info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_dipole
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top