MHB Is this the simplified form of (a + b)^3 - 8c^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on factoring the expression (a + b)^3 - 8c^3 as a difference of cubes. Participants confirm that the expression can be rewritten as (a + b)^3 - (2c)^3. The difference of cubes formula is applied, leading to the factorization (a + b - 2c)((a + b)^2 + 2c(a + b) + 4c^2). Clarifications are made regarding the interpretation of -8c^3, emphasizing that it can be expressed as -(2c)^3. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the correct application of the difference of cubes formula.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor (a + b)^3 - 8c^3.

Is this the difference of cubes?

Formula:

x^3 - a^3 = (x - a)(x^2 + ax + a^2)

Let x = (a + b)

Let a = 8

(a + b - 8)((a + b)^2 + 8(a + b) + 64)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by writing the expression as the difference of cubes:

$$(a+b)^3-8c^3=(a+b)^3-(2c)^3$$

Now apply the difference of cubes formula...:D
 
Why did you write -8c^3 as -(2c)^3?

The number 8 is not part of c^3.

Are you saying that -8•c^3 = (-8c)^3?
 
RTCNTC said:
Why did you write -8c^3 as -(2c)^3?

The number 8 is not part of c^3.

Are you saying that -8•c^3 = (-8c)^3?

I applied the exponential property:

$$x^ny^n=(xy)^n$$

Since $8=2^3$, we can write:

$$8c^3=2^3c^3=(2c)^3$$
 
I got it now.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
751
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
990
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top