Difference quotient problem and average rate of change

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the average rate of change of height for a soccer ball modeled by the equation h(t) = -4.9t^2 + 13.5t + 1.2. The correct expression for the average rate of change over the interval 2 <= t <= (2+h) is derived as [-4.9(2+h)^2 + 13.5(2+h) - 7.4] / h. The restrictions on h are established as h > 0.84, derived from the quadratic equation's zeroes, indicating that at t = 2.84 seconds, the height becomes zero, rendering the formula invalid beyond this point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of average rate of change
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly limits
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic functions and their graphs
  • Learn about the concept of limits in calculus
  • Explore the relationship between height and time in projectile motion
  • Investigate the implications of zeroes of functions on their validity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra and calculus, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone seeking to understand the mathematical modeling of physical phenomena.

needingtoknow
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A soccer ball is kicked into the air from a platform. The height of the ball, in metres, t seconds after it is kicked is modeled by h(t) = -4.9t^2 + 13.5t + 1.2.

I solved for the expression that represents the average rate of change of height over the interval 2<= t <= (2+h) and got which is correct (according to the answer key):

[-4.9(2+h)^2 + 13.5(2+h) - 7.4] / h

For what values of h is the expression above not valid?

The answer in the back states h>0.84; at 2.84 s, h = 0.

I understood how they got h>0.84 by finding the zeroes of the quadratic equation to get 2.84 and then subbing that into the inequality to get the change (h) to be 0.84. Therefore since t !> 2.84 h !> 0.84. But how do they get at 2.84 s, h != 0 as restrictions?

How did they get 0.84 and 2.84 in the restrictions. This question is a bit confusing to me. Can anyone help me find the answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is confusing that h is both used as the height of the object and a time.

h(t)=0 (the height) corresponds to the ball landing on the floor. This will certainly stop its free fall, and make the formula for h(t) invalid after that point.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K