Different dielectric material with different relative permittivity

AI Thread Summary
Different dielectric materials with varying relative permittivity affect capacitance when placed together, such as in concentric spheres filled with dielectrics A and B. The capacitance can be calculated using the formula C = ε₀ εᵣ A/d, where the voltage remains constant. When the dielectric is altered, such as when one plate of a capacitor pulls away, the effective capacitance decreases due to the increased gap, resembling two capacitors in series. The overall permittivity can be determined using the formula E = E1·E2/(E1 + E2). The presence of a conductor at the interface of the two dielectrics does not significantly impact the overall behavior as long as it is very thin.
FourierX
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I am wondering how to different dielectric material with different relative permittivity behave when put together. Say i have two concentric sphere and the space between them is filled with a dielectric of relative permittivity A from the outer surface of the inner sphere to the mid point between the inner and outer sphere and another dielectric of relative permittivity B fills the remaining space between the spheres. In such case, how do they behave and affect the capacitance of such a capacitor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The voltage between the plates remains, unchanging, the capcitance is calculated by, C_{ca} = {\epsilon}_0 {\epsilon}_r \frac {A}{d}. This in fact happens in real life, when capacitors are heated and one of the two plates in a parallel plate capacitor pulls away from the dielectric, another dielectric, air, fills in the gap. The capacitance is of course, reduced, but not only because of the greater gap.
 


I think it is like 2 separate capacitors (of half the spacing) in series. So the overall permittivity is the product / sum of the individual permittivity. In other words the presence of a conductor at the interface of the two dielectrics would have no effect as long as it was vanishingly thin.

E = E1.E2/E1 + E2
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top