Different forms of Bernoulli's equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a specific form of Bernoulli's equation used in medical contexts, particularly for blood flow in the aorta. This version includes terms for flow acceleration and viscous friction, which are not present in the traditional steady-state equation. The flow acceleration term accounts for changes in velocity over time, while the viscous friction term addresses drag effects, especially significant in smaller vessels like capillaries. Participants suggest researching "unsteady state Bernoulli equation" and "viscous flow in a pipe" for further understanding. Overall, the equation represents an energy balance that incorporates dynamic pressure and viscous effects.
Jak243
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was reading some textbooks on doppler echo for medicine and came across this version of the bernoulli equation for blood flow in the aorta. $$P_{1} - P_{2}= 1/2 \rho (v{_{2}}^{2}- v{_{1}}^{2}) + \rho \int_{1}^{2} \frac{\overrightarrow{dv}}{dt}\cdot \overrightarrow{ds} + R(\overrightarrow{v})$$ They call the second term on the rhs the flow acceleration and the last term on the rhs is the viscous friction. Can someone help explain the origin of the flow acceleration term and also offer a derivation of this form of the bernoulli equation from conservation of energy. Most simple derivations of the bernoulli equation only yield the familiar C = 1/2 ρ v^2 + ρgh + p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jak243 said:
I was reading some textbooks on doppler echo for medicine and came across this version of the bernoulli equation for blood flow in the aorta. $$P_{1} - P_{2}= 1/2 \rho (v{_{2}}^{2}- v{_{1}}^{2}) + \rho \int_{1}^{2} \frac{\overrightarrow{dv}}{dt}\cdot \overrightarrow{ds} + R(\overrightarrow{v})$$ They call the second term on the rhs the flow acceleration and the last term on the rhs is the viscous friction. Can someone help explain the origin of the flow acceleration term and also offer a derivation of this form of the bernoulli equation from conservation of energy. Most simple derivations of the bernoulli equation only yield the familiar C = 1/2 ρ v^2 + ρgh + p
The simple version you wrote is for a steady state flow in which the fluid velocity at any location in the fluid is not changing as a function of time. In the first equation, the 2nd term on the rhs is a correction to allow for the velocity to be changing with time. Google "unsteady state Bernoulli equation." The third term corrects for viscous drag at the walls of the conduit. In blood flow applications, particularly capillaries, the term can dominate. Google "viscous flow in a pipe."
 
Have you looked into trying to derive this yourself at all? I mean, just from looking at the terms you ought to be able to get a sense of what it is trying to do. The Bernoulli equation is essentially an energy balance that usually deals with energy due to static pressure, kinetic energy (dynamic pressure), and sometimes gravity. Clearly this neglects gravity, but the second RHS term ought to look pretty familiar to you in terms of an energy balance, and the last term is basically a catchall term for viscous terms.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top