Different techniques of integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter DennisG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on techniques for integrating the function ∫(x^3/(x+1)^10) dx. The original poster seeks clarification on their integration method and how to properly format the expression in LaTeX. Participants suggest using the tabular method and checking results with a graphing calculator for verification. A substitution method is proposed, where u = x + 1 simplifies the integration process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correct formatting, method selection, and verification in integration.
DennisG
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi, we're working on different techniques of integration and I just wanted to know if I got the right answer for this...

\int\frac{x^3}{(x+1)^10} dx (the denominator should be raised to the tenth and not the 1 with a big zero after it, if someone could tell me how to raise it to a power like that, it would also be appreciated)

I only got \frac{-(x+1)^-11}{11}\times\frac{x^4}{4}

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I'll address the latex problem: x^{10} will display x^{10}. Superscripting and subscripting should be surrounded by {}.

Next, what new method are you using? You can use the tabular method (a relative of integration by parts) and I'm sure there's at least one more method.

Another thing, if you have a graphing calculator you can check your answer by evaluating the indefinate integral as a definate integral--say 0 to 1 in this case. Evaluate your answer as a definate and see if the numbers you get from both methods are the same... I evaluated the original int from 0 to 1 and got a positive number and I see the bottom will yield a negativeover the same limits, so your answer is wrong. If you show us what you've done then someone will be able to point out your mistake.

Anyway, good luck.
 
DennisG

Try this

u = x+1

so

(u-1)^3 = x^3

Do you see it now?
 
ohhhhhh
thanks a lot
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top