Different voltage measure while probe connected to 50/5A CT

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unexpected voltage readings observed when connecting a probe to the secondary of a current transformer (CT) while measuring the primary current with a multi-meter. Participants explore the implications of using a ring type CT, the effects of impedance, and the potential need for amplification of the signal from a function generator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note a discrepancy in voltage readings, with 7.1V AC measured at the probe ends but only 45mV AC when connected to the CT.
  • There is a suggestion that the low impedance of the CT secondary effectively short circuits the output of a signal generator, necessitating the use of a buffer or amplifier.
  • One participant proposes using an automotive audio power amplifier to drive the CT, questioning whether an op-amp could suffice.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of a laminated CT for injecting audio current, with some participants suggesting that the impedance may be higher than initially considered.
  • There is a discussion about the expected output voltage from an audio amplifier and the feasibility of amplifying the 7.1V AC signal to a much higher voltage.
  • Some participants clarify that using the CT in reverse could lead to a significant reduction in output voltage based on the turns ratio, suggesting that more turns could be added to the CT to adjust the ratio.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate method for amplifying the signal and the implications of using a CT in reverse. There is no consensus on the best approach or the expected outcomes of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their measurements and the unknowns regarding the circuit resistance and output capabilities of the signal generator. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the effectiveness of various amplification methods and the behavior of the CT under different configurations.

Nikhil N
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
I have connected the probe to secondary of ring type CT and placed a wire as primary with one multi-meter connected at both ends. When I am checking the probe ends, its 7.1V AC, but it reading 45mV AC when connected to CT. Why this is happening?
ct_testing.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nikhil N said:
I have connected the prob to secondary of ring type CT and placed a wire as primary with one multi-meter connected at both ends. When I am checking the prob ends, its 7.1V AC, but it reading 45mV AC when connected to CT. Why this is happening?

so if you disconnect the CT coil from the function generator and you measure the output of the generator ... what is it's output ?
 
The 10 turn secondary of a CT, (designed to conduct 5 amp), will have a very low impedance. It will effectively short circuit the output of a signal generator.

It would be necessary to buffer or amplify the signal generator with something like an automotive audio power amplifier, rated to drive a 2 ohm speaker.
 
davenn said:
so if you disconnect the CT coil from the function generator and you measure the output of the generator ... what is it's output ?
7.1 V
 
Baluncore said:
The 10 turn secondary of a CT, (designed to conduct 5 amp), will have a very low impedance. It will effectively short circuit the output of a signal generator.

It would be necessary to buffer or amplify the signal generator with something like an automotive audio power amplifier, rated to drive a 2 ohm speaker.
Yah. The secondary has only 0.2 Ohm resistance. So what you are suggesting is to amplify the signal from signal generator and feeding to secondary of CT right? Can you give me the rating of amplifier to be used? Can I use Op-amp for the purpose?
 
Last edited:
Nikhil N said:
Can you give me the rating of amplifier to be used? Can I use Op-amp for the purpose?
I really think the use of a laminated CT to inject audio current will pose major problems. The 0R2 resistance ignores the inductance so impedance is probably closer to 2R.
But you can give it a try. There is plenty of signal voltage available from the generator so you do not need an op-amp. If you can find an old mains powered stereo amplifier with low impedance speaker output that could do the job. If not look for a power booster amp designed for automotive 12V operation it will be able to drive a low resistance coil on a CT. It will probably be rated at about 25W or more.
 
Baluncore said:
I really think the use of a laminated CT to inject audio current will pose major problems. The 0R2 resistance ignores the inductance so impedance is probably closer to 2R.
But you can give it a try. There is plenty of signal voltage available from the generator so you do not need an op-amp. If you can find an old mains powered stereo amplifier with low impedance speaker output that could do the job. If not look for a power booster amp designed for automotive 12V operation it will be able to drive a low resistance coil on a CT. It will probably be rated at about 25W or more.
If I am using a audio amplifier which will work in 12V, I can expect a max voltage of 12V right? I need to amplify 7.1V, AC signal to 1000times. Beacuse when I used 7.1V, the voltage came to primary was only 5.3mV, which is not prominent to act as noise into the cable. Please suggest me a amplifier which will be suitable for this purpose.
 
Nikhil N said:
Please suggest me a amplifier which will be suitable for this purpose.
This is the sort of amplifier I would consider using between your sig-gen and the 10 turn CT.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/191952191816?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT

Nikhil N said:
I need to amplify 7.1V, AC signal to 1000times.
No. That would produce 7kV. Your measurement was wrong.

Nikhil N said:
If I am using a audio amplifier which will work in 12V, I can expect a max voltage of 12V right?
Yes, but that is more than you will need.

You are using a current transformer backwards to inject current into a common mode bundle of wires. The CT turns ratio is then 10 : 1.
Since power in = power out, the output voltage will be 1/10 of the input voltage. The current induced in the output will be 10 times the input current.
You measured 5.3mV output voltage, so you probably had 53mV input voltage.
Your signal generator was unable to do better than that when driving the 10 turn CT.

We do not know the circuit or circuit resistance you used to measure the 5.3mV.
We do not know the output current capabilities of your signal generator.

You do not have to use the 10 turn CT secondary.
You could wind more secondary turns onto the CT core to change the ratio.
I would try 50 or 100 turns, driven directly by the sig-gen.
 
Baluncore said:
This is the sort of amplifier I would consider using between your sig-gen and the 10 turn CT.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/191952191816?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:ITNo. That would produce 7kV. Your measurement was wrong.Yes, but that is more than you will need.

You are using a current transformer backwards to inject current into a common mode bundle of wires. The CT turns ratio is then 10 : 1.
Since power in = power out, the output voltage will be 1/10 of the input voltage. The current induced in the output will be 10 times the input current.
You measured 5.3mV output voltage, so you probably had 53mV input voltage.
Your signal generator was unable to do better than that when driving the 10 turn CT.

We do not know the circuit or circuit resistance you used to measure the 5.3mV.
We do not know the output current capabilities of your signal generator.

You do not have to use the 10 turn CT secondary.
You could wind more secondary turns onto the CT core to change the ratio.
I would try 50 or 100 turns, driven directly by the sig-gen.
thanks for the replay
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Baluncore

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
64
Views
8K