Differential Area Element and surface integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct differential area element for surface integrals is definitively dA = dx dy. The discussion clarifies that while one can derive dA from the equation A = xy using the product rule (dA = xdy + ydx), this approach is not standard for surface integrals. The consensus emphasizes starting with the infinitesimal element for accurate calculations in line, surface, and volume integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals
  • Familiarity with differential calculus
  • Knowledge of the product rule in calculus
  • Basic concepts of infinitesimal elements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of differential area elements in surface integrals
  • Learn about the product rule in calculus and its implications
  • Explore the concept of infinitesimal elements in line and volume integrals
  • Research common mistakes in applying differential calculus to integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with surface integrals and need a clear understanding of differential area elements.

rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2
[SOLVED] Differential Area Element

While doing surface integrals, I am not sure as to which of the following is the correct differential area element to be considered:

i] dA = dx dy

or

ii]
A = xy

hence, using the product rule:

dA = xdy + ydx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is simply that dA = dxdy

Your second equation does not make sense. To use the product rule, you have to differentiate A with respect to either x or y.
 
the first one ... you always start with the infinitesimal element .

CrazyIvan said:
The short answer is simply that dA = dxdy

Your second equation does not make sense. To use the product rule, you have to differentiate A with respect to either x or y.

that's not completely correct ..
if you start with A=xy then dA=xdy+ydx is lgeit .. but we always start with the infinitesimal element when we perform line , surface and volume integrals .
 
Last edited:
thanks for the quick replies. I think I get it now...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K