I Differential equation from derivative of time dilation

bb1414
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hi all! I was messing around with the equation for time dilation. What I wanted to do was see how the time of a moving observer ##t'## changed with respect to the time of a stationary observer ##t##. So I differentiated the equation for time dilation ##t'## with respect to ##t##:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=\frac {d} {dt}\frac t {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}$$
Where ##v=\frac {dx} {dt}##. This gave me the following result:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=γ+\frac {tva} {γc^2}$$
Where ##γ=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}## and ##a=\frac {d^2x} {dt^2}##.

For one, I found this pretty interesting already, especially the product ##tva## in the numerator of the second term. Rewriting this in terms of the position of the moving observer ##x(t)## should help with I'm asking for:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}}+\frac {tx'x''} {c^2}\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}$$

I'm interested in finding a solution for when the change in the time of the moving observer with respect to the time of the stationary observer is zero, or ##\frac {dt'} {dt}=0##. More specifically, I'm trying to find a position function ##x(t)## that satisfies the differential equation:
$$0=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}}+\frac {tx'x''} {c^2}\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}$$
I'm not too great with differential equations (especially of this caliber) so I'm having some trouble solving this. Can any of you help me out here to find a generalized solution for ##x(t)##?

Thank you!

(Also, I'd love to hear your interpretations of my result for ##\frac {dt'} {dt}##!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your starting assumption is wrong. For a general observer for whom the velocity is not constant, the time-dilation is an integral relationship, i.e.,
$$
\tau = \int^t \gamma^{-1} \, dt,
$$
not ##\tau = \gamma t## (also note that it is ##\gamma^{-1}##, not ##\gamma##). Only for constant speed does this integrate to ##\tau = t/\gamma##.

bb1414 said:
I'm interested in finding a solution for when the change in the time of the moving observer with respect to the time of the stationary observer is zero, or ##\frac {dt'} {dt}=0##.

This is never the case. That derivative will always be ##\gamma^{-1}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Orodruin said:
Your starting assumption is wrong. For a general observer for whom the velocity is not constant, the time-dilation is an integral relationship, i.e.,
$$
\tau = \int^t \gamma^{-1} \, dt,
$$
not ##\tau = \gamma t## (also note that it is ##\gamma^{-1}##, not ##\gamma##). Only for constant speed does this integrate to ##\tau = t/\gamma##.
This is never the case. That derivative will always be ##\gamma^{-1}##.

Thanks for clearing this up Orodruin. My answer did seem a little odd to me, and this makes much more sense.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
bb1414 said:
Hi all! I was messing around with the equation for time dilation. What I wanted to do was see how the time of a moving observer ##t'## changed with respect to the time of a stationary observer ##t##. So I differentiated the equation for time dilation ##t'## with respect to ##t##:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=\frac {d} {dt}\frac t {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}$$
Where ##v=\frac {dx} {dt}##. This gave me the following result:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=γ+\frac {tva} {γc^2}$$
Where ##γ=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}## and ##a=\frac {d^2x} {dt^2}##.

I have a couple of concerns. Firstly, using your expression for t', I get
$$\frac{dt'}{dt} = \gamma +\frac{t\,v\,a}{\gamma^3 \, c^2}
$$

I have some other concerns. The Lorentz transform gives

$$t' = \gamma \left( t - \frac{vx}{c^2} \right)$$

are you intending to evaluate ##\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}## at x=0? This gives the answer that Orodruin mentioned if you work it out, namely

$$\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t} |_{x=0} = 1 / \gamma$$

In general ##\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}## will depend along what worldline one evaluates it, and it's a partial differential equation, not a differential equation. One can avoid using PDE's if one manages to replace one of the time coordinates with proper time, ##\tau##.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
265
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top