Differential equation from derivative of time dilation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the time dilation equation to explore how the time of a moving observer changes with respect to a stationary observer. Participants examine the implications of this differentiation, particularly in the context of non-constant velocities and the resulting differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant differentiates the time dilation equation and derives a relationship for ##\frac{dt'}{dt}##, expressing interest in finding a position function ##x(t)## that satisfies a specific differential equation.
  • Another participant challenges the initial assumption, stating that for a general observer with non-constant velocity, time dilation is an integral relationship rather than a simple derivative, asserting that the derivative will always equal ##\gamma^{-1}##.
  • A later reply acknowledges the challenge to the initial assumption and expresses agreement with the correction, indicating that the initial interpretation seemed odd.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the differentiation process and suggests that the evaluation of ##\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}## depends on the worldline, proposing that it is a partial differential equation rather than a simple differential equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the initial assumptions about time dilation and the nature of the derivative. There is no consensus on the correct approach to the problem, with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about velocity constancy and the interpretation of time dilation. The relationship between the variables and the context of the worldline evaluation remains unresolved.

bb1414
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hi all! I was messing around with the equation for time dilation. What I wanted to do was see how the time of a moving observer ##t'## changed with respect to the time of a stationary observer ##t##. So I differentiated the equation for time dilation ##t'## with respect to ##t##:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=\frac {d} {dt}\frac t {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}$$
Where ##v=\frac {dx} {dt}##. This gave me the following result:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=γ+\frac {tva} {γc^2}$$
Where ##γ=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}## and ##a=\frac {d^2x} {dt^2}##.

For one, I found this pretty interesting already, especially the product ##tva## in the numerator of the second term. Rewriting this in terms of the position of the moving observer ##x(t)## should help with I'm asking for:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}}+\frac {tx'x''} {c^2}\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}$$

I'm interested in finding a solution for when the change in the time of the moving observer with respect to the time of the stationary observer is zero, or ##\frac {dt'} {dt}=0##. More specifically, I'm trying to find a position function ##x(t)## that satisfies the differential equation:
$$0=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}}+\frac {tx'x''} {c^2}\sqrt {1 - \frac {x'^2} {c^2}}$$
I'm not too great with differential equations (especially of this caliber) so I'm having some trouble solving this. Can any of you help me out here to find a generalized solution for ##x(t)##?

Thank you!

(Also, I'd love to hear your interpretations of my result for ##\frac {dt'} {dt}##!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your starting assumption is wrong. For a general observer for whom the velocity is not constant, the time-dilation is an integral relationship, i.e.,
$$
\tau = \int^t \gamma^{-1} \, dt,
$$
not ##\tau = \gamma t## (also note that it is ##\gamma^{-1}##, not ##\gamma##). Only for constant speed does this integrate to ##\tau = t/\gamma##.

bb1414 said:
I'm interested in finding a solution for when the change in the time of the moving observer with respect to the time of the stationary observer is zero, or ##\frac {dt'} {dt}=0##.

This is never the case. That derivative will always be ##\gamma^{-1}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Orodruin said:
Your starting assumption is wrong. For a general observer for whom the velocity is not constant, the time-dilation is an integral relationship, i.e.,
$$
\tau = \int^t \gamma^{-1} \, dt,
$$
not ##\tau = \gamma t## (also note that it is ##\gamma^{-1}##, not ##\gamma##). Only for constant speed does this integrate to ##\tau = t/\gamma##.
This is never the case. That derivative will always be ##\gamma^{-1}##.

Thanks for clearing this up Orodruin. My answer did seem a little odd to me, and this makes much more sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
bb1414 said:
Hi all! I was messing around with the equation for time dilation. What I wanted to do was see how the time of a moving observer ##t'## changed with respect to the time of a stationary observer ##t##. So I differentiated the equation for time dilation ##t'## with respect to ##t##:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=\frac {d} {dt}\frac t {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}$$
Where ##v=\frac {dx} {dt}##. This gave me the following result:
$$\frac {dt'} {dt}=γ+\frac {tva} {γc^2}$$
Where ##γ=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}## and ##a=\frac {d^2x} {dt^2}##.

I have a couple of concerns. Firstly, using your expression for t', I get
$$\frac{dt'}{dt} = \gamma +\frac{t\,v\,a}{\gamma^3 \, c^2}
$$

I have some other concerns. The Lorentz transform gives

$$t' = \gamma \left( t - \frac{vx}{c^2} \right)$$

are you intending to evaluate ##\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}## at x=0? This gives the answer that Orodruin mentioned if you work it out, namely

$$\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t} |_{x=0} = 1 / \gamma$$

In general ##\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}## will depend along what worldline one evaluates it, and it's a partial differential equation, not a differential equation. One can avoid using PDE's if one manages to replace one of the time coordinates with proper time, ##\tau##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
948
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K