Differential equations and equilibrium points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differential equations and the analysis of equilibrium points in a system described by the equations \(\dot{x}=y\) and \(\dot{y}=x^{3}-x\). Participants are exploring the process of determining stability at these equilibrium points through linearization and the use of Jacobian matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the system in matrix form and questions the necessity of using the Jacobian matrix for stability analysis. Some participants suggest linearizing the equations around the equilibrium points and clarify the role of the Jacobian in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of linearization and stability analysis. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the Jacobian matrix, and there is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to take for the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the linearization process and the representation of the equations in matrix form, particularly concerning the non-linearity of the original system. Participants are also addressing the implications of approximating functions at equilibrium points.

kidsmoker
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/4873/46343978.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a) is simple enough, i get

\dot{x}=y
\dot{y}=x^{3}-x.

Equilibrium points occur when the time-derivatives of both x and y are zero, which gives the 3 equilibrium points (0,0), (1,0) and (-1,0).

Now I thought i'd better write it as a matrix equation as this is how i remember doing these type of problems, so if we write

X=\begin{pmatrix}x \\ y \end{pmatrix} then

\dot{X}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ x^{2}-1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}X

(sorry, you have to look closely to see where the dots are!).

I would have thought i'd then have to find the eigenvales of this matrix for each of my equilibrium points to find the stability of each one? But when I look at the solution, it uses the Jacobian matrix and finds the eigenvalues of that instead?! I'm confused!

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can really do what you did, because x is now both in the vector X and in the coefficient matrix.

IIRC the idea is usually that you linearize the equation around the equilibrium points. So you make a first-order Taylor series around the equilibrium point. The constant term will simply be the equilibrium point itself, and the first order term (which gives the information about the stability) will be the Jacobian multiplied by a vector. Try working it out for yourself.
 
Ah okay thanks. I'll have a go.
 
You can't write the two equations as a matrix equaiton because it is not linear. What you can do is approximate it at each point of interest (in particular, the equilibrium points) as a linear problem. You should remember that when you approximate a function, at a point, by a linear function you are using the tangent line approximation so that the slope is the derivative.

That is what is happening here. To get a linear equation \dot{X}= Ax, A is the "derivative", that is, the Jacobian you mention, evaluated at each equilibrium point.

By the way, the derivative of x^3- x is [math]3x^2- 1[/math], not [math]x^2- 1[/math]!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
870
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K