Differential equations particle motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the position function x(t) for a particle under the influence of a force F(v) = -bV², where participants are exploring the relationship between force, mass, and velocity through differential equations. The context involves concepts from physics and calculus, particularly focusing on motion and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the force equation and its implications for velocity and position. There are attempts to derive x(t) from the given force function, with some questioning the treatment of initial conditions and constants of integration.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts. Some have pointed out inconsistencies related to initial conditions and the behavior of the derived equations at t=0. There is a collaborative effort to clarify misunderstandings and refine the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Initial conditions, such as the initial velocity being zero or non-zero, are under discussion, and there are concerns about how these affect the derived equations. The presence of logarithmic terms raises questions about their behavior at specific points, particularly at t=0.

philnow
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey all. I have F(v) and I'm looking for x(t).

F(v) = -bV2

I'm a physics undergrad student who hasn't done diff. equations in a while, so I'm very unsure of my work so far... but here it is.

The Attempt at a Solution



I write F=ma as F(v)=mdv/dt:

-bV2=mdv/dt

-m∫ dv/v2 = -b ∫dt

-m/v = -bt
m/v = bt

v = m/bt = dx/dt

∫ dx = m/b ∫ dt/t

Finally x(t) = m/b*ln(t)

Does this look good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philnow said:

Homework Statement


Hey all. I have F(v) and I'm looking for x(t).

F(v) = -bV2

I'm a physics undergrad student who hasn't done diff. equations in a while, so I'm very unsure of my work so far... but here it is.

The Attempt at a Solution



I write F=ma as F(v)=mdv/dt:

-bV2=mdv/dt

-m∫ dv/v2 = -b ∫dt

-m/v = -bt
m/v = bt +constant

don't forget the constant.

Otherwise it looks alright. Also remember that ma can be written as mv dv/dx as well
 
I forgot to add that the initial position and initial velocity are both zero so I don't need to worry about constants. Thanks!
 
Are you sure the initial velocity is zero?

philnow said:
Finally x(t) = m/b*ln(t)

Differentiate that expression. Do you get dx/dt=0 at t=0?
 
I misinformed you all, the particle has an initial velocity Vo. My bad. Even still I see that if I put 0 for t in my equation, it is undefined, when it should be zero.

I don't really know how to take it from here, any hints? How do I take into account the constant?
 
philnow said:
-m∫ dv/v2 = -b ∫dt

-m/v = -bt
This is where things go awry, since the equation is contradictory to v=v0 when t=0.

rock.freak667 said:
don't forget the constant.
Yes, exactly. When you integrate, add a constant. What constant will give v=v0 when t=0?
 
How does this seem?

x(t) = m/b*ln(t) + Vo*t
 
Unfortunately, that does not give x(0)=0, due to the ln(t) term.

Also, the initial velocity appears to be infinite, again due to the ln(t) term.

If you show your work, we can help figure out what went wrong.
 
Here's my work:

-bV2=mdv/dt

-m∫ dv/v2 = -b ∫dt

(note: so the integral of 1/v^2 is -1/v, and this integral is from initial v to final v) so:

bt = m(1/v - 1/vo) where vo is initial velocity

bt/m = 1/v - 1/vo

m/bt + vo = v

m/bt + vo = dx/dt

∫(m/bt + vo)dt = ∫dx

m/b*ln(t) + vo*t = x(t)
 
  • #10
philnow said:
Here's my work:

-bV2=mdv/dt

-m∫ dv/v2 = -b ∫dt

(note: so the integral of 1/v^2 is -1/v, and this integral is from initial v to final v) so:

bt = m(1/v - 1/vo) where vo is initial velocity

bt/m = 1/v - 1/vo
Okay so far.

m/bt + vo = v
This step does not follow from the previous one. (We can tell because t=0 implies v=∞, instead of v=vo, in this equation.)

Instead, this step could have been

(bt/m) + (1/vo) = 1/v​
See if you can take if from there.
 
  • #11
(bt/m) + (1/vo) = 1/v

doesn't this mean v = m/bt + Vo?
 
  • #12
philnow said:
(bt/m) + (1/vo) = 1/v

doesn't this mean v = m/bt + Vo?

No, what it means is that v is the reciprocal of

(bt/m) + (1/vo)​

which is

[tex]\frac{1}{(bt/m) + (1/v_o)}[/tex]
 
  • #13
Redbelly98 said:
No, what it means is that v is the reciprocal of

(bt/m) + (1/vo)​

which is

[tex]\frac{1}{(bt/m) + (1/v_o)}[/tex]

Please tell me I've done this right:

from there:

∫dx = ∫https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/23/2356837-0.png

x = m/b*ln(bt/m + 1/vo) - m/b*ln(1/vo)

for t=0, x=0 and when differentiated, at t=0,v=vo
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K