Differential Equations, Particular and Complimentary solutions

JefeNorte
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the differential equation for y=y(x)
(1) L[y]=y"+2by'+yb^2=(e^(-bx))/(x^2) x>0
a)find the complementary solution of (1) by solving L[y]=0
b)Solve (1) by introducing the transformation y(x)=(e^(-bx))*v(x) into (1) and obtaining and solving completely a differential equation for v(x). Use this to identify the particular solution

The Attempt at a Solution



Follwing the steps outline at http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/UndeterminedCoefficients.aspx
I converted y"+by'+yb^2 to r^2+2br+b^2=0

By factoring I determined that r1=r2=-b
so the complimentary solution should be y=c1*e^(-bt)+c2*e^(-bt)

Is this the right way to solve for a complimentary solution? If so how do I "induce the transformation to solve fro the particular solution?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that is not correct. the complimentary solution is y= C_1e^{-bt}+ C_2t e^{-bt}.

How about doing what the problem asks you to do: "Solve (1) by introducing the transformation y(x)=(e^(-bx))*v(x) into (1)"?

If y(x)= e^{-bx}v(x), what are y' and y"? Put those into the equation and see what equation you get for v.

Don't forget that the equation is 2by', not the by' you wrote in "I converted---". With the "2", it reduces nicely. Without, it's a mess!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So after introducing y(x)= v(x)*e^(-bx) to the initial equation I came up with v"=1/(x^2)

Using this I came up with v(x)=(4/3)x^(1.5)

So y(x)=((4/3)x^1.5)*e^(-bx) is the particular solution? I apologize for being so dense but I don't actually take this class until next semester, I am just trying to get ahead. Thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top