MHB Differentiating Complex Square Root Function: Bruce P. Palka, Ex. 1.5, Ch. III

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on differentiating the complex square root function as presented in Bruce P. Palka's book. A key point raised is the expression for the square root of a complex number, specifically questioning why it is written as $$\sqrt{z} = \sqrt{|z|} e^{i \theta(z)/2}$$ instead of $$\sqrt{z} = |\sqrt{z}| e^{i \theta(z)/2}$$. The response clarifies that the goal is to express $$\sqrt{z}$$ in the form of $$re^{i\theta}$$, where both r and θ are real numbers. An example using the complex number 4i illustrates how the square roots can be derived. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly representing complex functions in their polar form.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce P. Palka's book: An Introduction to Complex Function Theory ...

I am focused on Chapter III: Analytic Functions, Section 1.2 Differentiation Rules ...

I need help with an aspect of Example 1.5, Section 1.2, Chapter III ...

Example 1.5, Section 1.2, Chapter III, reads as follows:
View attachment 9335
View attachment 9336

At the start of the above example we read the following:

" ... ... Write $$\theta (z) = \text{Arg } z$$. Then $$\sqrt{z} = \sqrt{ \mid z \mid } e^{ i \theta(z)/2 }$$. ... "My question is as follows:

How exactly is $$\sqrt{z} = \sqrt{ \mid z \mid } e^{ i \theta(z)/2 }$$In particular ... surely it should be $$\sqrt{z} = \mid \sqrt{ z } \mid e^{ i \theta(z)/2 }$$ ... ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Palka - 1 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 1 ... .png
    Palka - 1 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 1 ... .png
    1.7 KB · Views: 139
  • Palka - 2 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 2 ... .png
    Palka - 2 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 2 ... .png
    28.3 KB · Views: 130
Physics news on Phys.org
In particular ... surely it should be $$\sqrt{z} = \mid \sqrt{ z } \mid e^{ i \theta(z)/2 }$$ ... ...

Peter
It wouldn't make much sense to write [math]\sqrt{z}[/math] in terms of [math]|\sqrt{z}|[/math]!

For z a complex number, [math]|z|[/math] is a positive real number and so is [math]\sqrt{|z|}[/math]. The purpose here is to write [math]\sqrt{z}[/math] in the form [math]re^{i\theta}[/math] with r and [math]\theta[/math] real numbers.

For example, taking z= 4i, r= 4 and [math]\theta= \pi/2[/math] so that |z|= 4 and [math]\sqrt{|z|}= 2[/math]. The two square roots of 4i are [math]2 e^{i\pi/4}= \sqrt{2}+ i\sqrt{2}[/math] and
[math]2 e^{i(\pi+ 2pi)/4}= 2e^{3i\pi/4}= \sqrt{2}- i\sqrt{2}[/math].

 
HallsofIvy said:
It wouldn't make much sense to write [math]\sqrt{z}[/math] in terms of [math]|\sqrt{z}|[/math]!

For z a complex number, [math]|z|[/math] is a positive real number and so is [math]\sqrt{|z|}[/math]. The purpose here is to write [math]\sqrt{z}[/math] in the form [math]re^{i\theta}[/math] with r and [math]\theta[/math] real numbers.

For example, taking z= 4i, r= 4 and [math]\theta= \pi/2[/math] so that |z|= 4 and [math]\sqrt{|z|}= 2[/math]. The two square roots of 4i are [math]2 e^{i\pi/4}= \sqrt{2}+ i\sqrt{2}[/math] and
[math]2 e^{i(\pi+ 2pi)/4}= 2e^{3i\pi/4}= \sqrt{2}- i\sqrt{2}[/math].


THanks so much for the help ...

.. it is much appreciated...

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K