Differentiating Complex Functions with Respect to x

AI Thread Summary
To differentiate the function dy = 3x^2 - 5√x + 1/2x^2 with respect to x, it's important to convert terms to their correct index forms. The term 5√x should be expressed as 5(x)^(1/2), not (x)^(1/5). The last term was clarified to be 1/(2x^2), which simplifies to (1/2)(x^(-2)). Properly interpreting these terms is crucial for accurate differentiation. Understanding these conversions allows for correct application of differentiation rules.
Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Differentiate with respect to x

dy = 3x^2 - 5√x + 1/2x^2
dx

__________________________________________

I don't understand how to differentiate this part: 5√x + 1/2x^2. I think changing it to indices form would be: x^1/5 + (2x)^-2?

How can it be worked out? :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
5\sqrt{x} is not (x)^{\frac{1}{5}}. It is five times (x)^{\frac{1}{2}}.

The last term is a bit ambiguous, the way you've typed it. Is it \frac{1}{2}x^2 or \frac{1}{2x^2}? Anyway, neither cannot be simplified to (2x)^-2.
 
neutrino said:
5\sqrt{x} is not (x)^{\frac{1}{5}}. It is five times (x)^{\frac{1}{2}}.

That makes more sense. :biggrin:

neutrino said:
The last term is a bit ambiguous, the way you've typed it. Is it \frac{1}{2}x^2 or \frac{1}{2x^2}? Anyway, neither cannot be simplified to (2x)^-2.

It's \frac{1}{2x^2}
 
Anived said:
It's \frac{1}{2x^2}

It's then (1/2)(x^-2). (2x)^-2 would be (1/4)(x^-2).
 
neutrino said:
It's then (1/2)(x^-2). (2x)^-2 would be (1/4)(x^-2).

Ok. I understand. Thanks for the help. :biggrin:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top