Difficult Planetary motion problem

AI Thread Summary
Planet X has a rotational behavior similar to Earth, with an astronaut's weight varying from 917.0 N at the north pole to 860.0 N at the equator. The radius of Planet X is calculated to be approximately 11,987,550 meters. The astronaut's mass is determined to be 96.9 kg based on their Earth weight. The discussion revolves around whether the difference in weight can be attributed to centripetal force, leading to a formula involving gravitational forces and rotational dynamics. The importance of consistent units in calculations is emphasized, indicating a potential error in the initial approach.
Hockeystar
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Planet X rotates in the same manner as the earth, around an axis through its north and south poles, and is perfectly spherical. An astronaut who weighs 950.0 N on the Earth weighs 917.0 N at the north pole of Planet X and only 860.0 N at its equator. The distance from the north pole to the equator is 1.883×104 km , measured along the surface of Planet X. How long is the day on Planet X?



Homework Equations



A lot

The Attempt at a Solution



First we solve the radius of Planet:

circumfrence = 0.5pi(r)
r=11987550m

Next we solve m: 950N/9.8 m/s2 = 96.9kg

Then the tricky tricky part. Should I assume the loss of weight is equal to the centripetal force? In that case I have

mgnorth pole - mgequator = m4pi2r2/T2
T= 9.82e7s

However my answer is incorrect. Is my theory sound? Did I make a calculation error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It all looks good except I think you have an extra r in m4pi²r²/T², which makes a large difference in the answer.
 
Hockeystar said:
mgnorth pole - mgequator = m4pi2r2/T2
Look at your units. The left hand side has units of mass*acceleration or mass*length/time2. The units on the right hand side are mass*length2/time2. Once you get into the habit of checking units, it takes but a few seconds to double check that you have consistent units. When you don't have consistent units, as is the case here, you *know* you have made an error somewhere.
 
Thanks for the help guys :-)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top