Difficulty with non-inertial frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter anomalous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Frames
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on difficulties in solving homework problems related to non-inertial frames of reference. The individual expresses confidence in visualizing problems and creating free body diagrams (FBD) but struggles with the mathematical integration of these concepts to reach correct solutions. A specific example involving a child on a water slide illustrates the confusion between centripetal acceleration and the forces required to lift her head. Suggestions emphasize the importance of understanding rotational dynamics and angular velocity before tackling numerical problems. The consensus is that improving mathematical expression and theory comprehension is crucial for mastering these types of problems.
anomalous
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I seem to be having some trouble processing non-inertial frame homework problems. I hear that sometimes attempting to explain the problem helps with the understanding so here goes. I don't think I have any difficulty visualizing the problems. Creating free body diagrams (FBD) from the non-inertial (NI) reference frame are pretty easy using fictitious forces. And I know I'm o.k. at FBD's from inertial (I) reference frames. But I seem unable to combine them properly mathematically to obtain a correct final solution. A good example:

A kid is on a water slide riding high on a horizontal curve raising her head to look past her toes. With the given radius and velocity I have no trouble obtaining centripetal accel. and the radial force. Knowing that her neck muscles exert a given force while at rest (lying down) to lift her head normally I need to determine the force req'd to look past her toes on the slide. My first attempt used the assumption that I needed to determine the mass of her head and multiply that by the centripetal accel. to find the force req'd to lift her head at that velocity against the "centrifugal" force. It seems I didn't need the mass and I should have used only accel. components. And I foolishly assumed gravity wasn't an issue. I also think I forgot about basic vector addition in solving, arrrgh! Finally, the solution used the ratio of accel. of -NI- vs. -I- to determine a multiple for the original force to lift her head to obtain the final answer. I'm not sure I would have thought of that.

I suppose my main questions are; What suggestions can anyone give as to a good course of action to better solve these types of problems? And, if no suggestions is it better to just continue to plug and chug a lot of these till I get the hang of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
YOUR PROBLEM DOES NOT LIE IN NON INERTIAL FRAMES BUT RATHER THE ABILITY TO EXPRESS IT MATHEMATICALLY.ROTATION AND CONCEPTS OF ANGULAR VELOCITY ARE VERY IMPORTANT COURSE AND BEFORE YOU PROCEED TO SOLVE ANY NUMERICALS ALWAYS HAVE THE THEORY WITH YA.

http://www.mel.nist.gov/div822/basic.htm
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top