Difficulty with Sakurai, Ch.1, Problem # 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantumkiko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Sakurai
quantumkiko
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the eigenvector for (S \cdot \hat{n}) |eigenvector> = (\hbar)/2 |eigenvector> where S = (\hbar)/2 \sigma. The sigmas are the Pauli spin matrices and \hat{n} = sin\beta cos\alpha \hat{i} + sin\beta\ sin\alpha \hat{j} + cos\beta \hat{k}

You have to solve for the coefficients a and b of

|eigenvector> = a|+> + b|->.

2. The attempt at a solution

It seems like when I try to solve for one coefficient, say a, is seems to vanish.

a(\cos\beta - 1) + b\sin\beta e^{-i\alpha} = 0
a\sin\beta e^{i\alpha} - b(\cos\beta + 1) = 0

For example, isolating b in the 1st equation,

b = - \frac{a(\cos\beta - 1)}{ \sin\beta e^{-i\alpha}}.

If you plug this in the 2nd equation you get a factor of a for all terms, therefore the a's cancel each other.

But Sakurai's solution is |eigenvector> = cos(\beta / 2)|+> + sin{\beta / 2} e^{i\alpha}|->. How can I get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi quantumkiko! :smile:

(have an alpha: α and a beta: β and a sigma: σ :wink:)
quantumkiko said:
Determine the eigenvector for (S \cdot \hat{n}) …

It seems like when I try to solve for one coefficient, say a, is seems to vanish.

a(\cos\beta - 1) + b\sin\beta e^{-i\alpha} = 0
a\sin\beta e^{i\alpha} - b(\cos\beta + 1) = 0

hmm … i can see σ3 in there somewhere …

with eigenvectors which would be (a,b) = (1,0) or (0,1) if β = 0 or π …

but whatever happened to poor little σ1 and σ2? :redface:

(btw you have to put [noparse]before and after for the LaTeX to work in this forum[/noparse] :wink:)
 
Thank you very much! ^^
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top