Diffraction Grating and Intensity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the maximum intensity for a diffraction grating with N slits is N^2 times greater than that of a single slit. The relevant equation for intensity is provided, along with the condition that the maximum occurs at Φ=0. A key step involves using the limit of sin(Nx)/sin(x) as x approaches 0, which can be derived through a specific trigonometric identity. The participants clarify the manipulation of the equation, leading to a better understanding of the proof. Ultimately, the original poster expresses gratitude for the assistance and confirms their comprehension of the topic.
silence98
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the maximum intensity for a diffraction grating of N slits at the first principal maximum is N^2 times bigger than for a single slit.


Homework Equations



I=I(0)[sin^2(NB)/sin^2(B)] where B is (\pidsin\phi)/\lambda


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel i understand the concepts here but this question has stumped me. I've scoured the internet, read through the relevant chapters in my two textbooks and still i can't see how this would be proven. It is just stated in my lecture notes, is it that intuitive?

I really would be grateful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The maximum is at Φ=0. You have to start with the limit sin(x)/x when x tends to 0. Find the limit of sin(Nx)/sin(x). Use that sin(Nx)/sin(x)=[sin(Nx)/Nx] N [x/sin(x)].

ehild
 
ehild said:
The maximum is at Φ=0. You have to start with the limit sin(x)/x when x tends to 0. Find the limit of sin(Nx)/sin(x). Use that sin(Nx)/sin(x)=[sin(Nx)/Nx] N [x/sin(x)].

ehild

Thanks for the help, but i don't really understand the bolded part. I haven't seen that trig identity before and i can't see how it would be found.
 
It is just multiplying both the numerator and the denominator with the same quantity and rearranging.

\frac{\sin(Nx)}{\sin(x)}=\frac{Nx\sin(Nx)}{Nx\sin(x)}=\frac{\sin(Nx)}{Nx} N \frac{x}{\sin(x)}

ehild
 
ehild said:
It is just multiplying both the numerator and the denominator with the same quantity and rearranging.

\frac{\sin(Nx)}{\sin(x)}=\frac{Nx\sin(Nx)}{Nx\sin(x)}=\frac{\sin(Nx)}{Nx} N \frac{x}{\sin(x)}

ehild

Thankyou, and i apologise for my stupidity!

I've got it now.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top