Diffraction lens diameter Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the effective lens diameter for a spy satellite using diffraction principles. The focal length of the lens is 3.5 m, and it can resolve objects as small as 36 cm. The Rayleigh criterion is applied, leading to the calculation of angular resolution and ultimately the effective lens diameter, which is found to be approximately 2.88 meters. This value indicates that diffraction is not the sole factor affecting the satellite's resolution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding diffraction limits in optical systems.
purduegrad
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Tried this problem for about 2 hrs and no dice...

A spy satellite orbiting at 150 km above the Earth's surface has a lens with a focal length of 3.5 m and can resolve objects on the ground as small as 36 cm; it can easily measure the size of an aircraft's air intake. What is the effective lens diameter, determined by diffraction consideration alone? Assume = 527 nm.

I don't think the 150km matters...
i just did .36 = f*theta and i got theta = .36/3.5


then i did theta = wavelength /d (diameter) and i get like 5.12e-6M

totally wrong...help

btw as soon as someone replies i will prolly reply back since its kinda urgent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the Rayleigh criterion for a circular aperture:

\sin \theta_R = 1.22 \frac{\lambda}{d}

In this case, \theta_R is the angle subtended by a 36 cm feature from 150 km away. Hint: draw a right triangle. The angle subtended is

\begin{align*}<br /> \theta_R &amp;= 2 \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{0.18}{150 \cdot 10^3} \right)\\<br /> &amp; \approx \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{0.36}{150 \cdot 10^3} \right)\\<br /> &amp; \approx 2.4 \cdot 10^{-6}\ \text{rad}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

The Rayleigh criterion then gives

\begin{align*}<br /> d &amp;= \frac{1.22 \lambda}{\sin \theta_R}\\<br /> &amp; \approx 0.27\ m<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Does this make sense?

- Warren
 


First of all, I would like to commend you for putting in the effort to solve this problem for 2 hours. Diffraction problems can be tricky, so don't get discouraged if you haven't found the correct answer yet.

To solve this problem, we need to use the diffraction limit formula: θ = 1.22λ/D, where θ is the angular resolution, λ is the wavelength, and D is the diameter of the lens.

Since we are given the focal length of the lens (3.5 m) and the smallest resolvable object (36 cm), we can use the formula θ = 1.22λ/f to find the angular resolution. Plugging in the values, we get:

θ = 1.22 * 527 nm / 3.5 m = 1.83e-4 radians

Now, we can use the formula θ = λ/D to find the effective lens diameter. Rearranging the formula, we get:

D = λ/θ = 527 nm / 1.83e-4 = 2.88 m

Therefore, the effective lens diameter, determined by diffraction consideration alone, is approximately 2.88 meters. This is larger than the actual lens diameter of 3.5 m, which means that diffraction is not the only factor limiting the resolution of the spy satellite.

I hope this helps you understand the problem better. Keep practicing and don't give up, you will eventually get the hang of diffraction problems!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top